| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> Humanity; our begining. | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Humanity; our begining. |
| Posted By: Zack Posted On: Jun 10, 2005 Views: 1509 | Humanity; our begining. >Keith Make sure you have a bit of time to read this. It could get long. But I have read comments that it is very interesting to read. I have an interesting theory to explain. I have done a little bit of story writing in my past. Nothing too serious. And therefor I always try to develop story lines that are believable theories. I was also, at one time a 'clan freak'. I would love to get into a game clan and make it thrive. Because of my knowledge of website development and programming, flash movies and computer programming, I was easily accepted into many of the clans and guilds. I was always developing a theory of the 'short term period'. What I mean by that is, in the past fifty thousand years. The list is in no order of how much I believe in the theory. Theory #1: Life was transported here Mars, it is a desolate place, and it has been thought to have had life on it long before. The polar ice caps on mars have water, which is the prime ingredient for life to thrive. It is one of I think about 11 rocks (planets, asteroids, moons) that could host human life itself. I forget the list and I do not have enough time to search through NASA.gov. How did we get from Mars? Well, there are several methods of how this could have happened. Pyramids are one of the methods. You think I am crazy right? They are just a triangle of blocks; a tomb. Well, open your mind up. The pyramids have depictions of helicopters on the walls. It is kinda odd how there are also depictions of people using magical powers and energy. Perhaps they are very metaphoric or like to exaggerate to keep people in fear of them. Many geologists and historians strongly believe that our human race had pretty good technology at one time. It is safe to say that perhaps they had developed a method of space travel. You think this is probably a far fetched idea, so is telekinesis. I am going to follow this idea up with one other piece of information right after I give one other space travel idea. But of course this idea destroys the fact we came from mars. Invisible Planet. Whoa! You would think the pyramid idea was crazy, but do not bash the idea. It is actually noted by many scientists of something we call 'black matter' and 'invisible matter'. I will probably study this more, since I have not much to tell you or know the science of this black matter. Many scientists claim that there is a 'mysterious' planet that has an orbit unlike ours. IT goes far out into our galaxy very slowly then comes into our solar system. It comes so close to Earth that it almost touches. And that would explain the follow up that I told you about earlier. But I will bring that up later too. Some people believe that this mysterious planet is where we came from. And judging by the phenomena of our consciousness (you can connect the dots yourself, I will not describe unless you really want me to), it is not that far fetched. Some believe that there is where we were capable of magic, or perhaps the people that knew magic stayed back on the planet. Now, the follow up. The great flood. But, you say this is a biblical event, possibly never happened! Well, you are wrong. There is plenty of evidence of a great flood. It is shown in the sedimentary rock of the Grand Canyon. It has been documented plenty of times. And what is also interesting is that this flood has buried many old cities. There are geologists that found a city in Egypt buried under ground. Nowhere near a lake or ocean that would flood it. Now how does this really relate to our past two methods of space travel? Well, consider if the 'ark' is a metaphoric or even real story of people that were told of this event on the 'mysterious planet'. Perhaps magicians foreseen it, perhaps it was written in the sky. Perhaps it was told to them, booming across the sky. Or perhaps they saw a planet in the sky coming closer and closer! And this flood lasted more than a month? Sounds like a planet passing to me! And with a planet passing there should definitely be some gravitational pull. Heck the moon creates waves on the ocean every day. We call it 'tide'. And the moon is pretty small compared to many of the rocks in the solar system. If a fairly good-sized planet passed by, it would pull that water right up to it from Earth. Sounds like a great flood to me? Now, what about the transportation from mars? Well, perhaps maybe the ark is the 'pyramid'. And the story is metaphorical to traveling across the big 'ocean' that many astronauts will refer space about. But that does not explain why there was an evident big flood. Now, you may be tickled and think these ideas must be it. But that is only the first theory. Theory #2: Middle Earth No, I am no Lords of the Rings freak (although I liked watching it)! It is talked about a lot. A man that went to the North Pole, to come back many years later, with detailed maps of an entire world. That would suggest that there are portals, pretty stretched out theory, but there are many scientists that are on the study. Consider the Bermuda triangle, and other weird spots. Consider el Nina phenomena, if you read up on it, the Bermuda triangle and the el Nina are in the same place on this planet. Coincidence? I think not. Perhaps maybe there is a hidden portal where no one can get to it. Perhaps there is a civilization there. Or perhaps the ozone is bad in the area. That does not really give us any information about where all those planes and ships that vanished went. This would probably relate to the mysterious planet travel. But why do I keep noting that magic is something that has happened before? Well, I am suggesting, perhaps it was possible in the past, and humanity was abandoned by those magicians or was left here on this planet. That is probably why we cannot find magic abilities. Course perhaps maybe there never was magic. Theory #3: Evolution - The Most Probable. Ok, most religions do not believe in Evolution. However, this is probably the most probable cause of our existence. Earth would be our birthplace, and where we began. However, many scientists believe that human life was developed too quickly by evolution. I think they said something around fifty to seventy-five thousand years. That is a relatively short time. They say that we have developed from monkeys. They are our ancestors: -S. But judging by the past two thousand years, human life has drastically improved via technology and life. So I feel it would not be too improbable for the speed it took us to evolve. If evolution is how we become, then I guess Mr. Smith was right. Humans are not really mammals. Mammals create certain equilibrium with their surrounding environment. Humans do not. Humans are a virus; a disease of this planet, a plague. However, you must ask the question, how did life start on this planet via evolution? Well, no one really can tell you Ask, any scientist out there, and there is no answer. We can get from the asteroid to the little worms, but scientists cannot figure out how those little worms became complex organisms like ourselves. Which also states one other thing, if evolution is our reason. The probability of telekinesis is very, very slim. But then again, one must realize. When a monkey reached towards the trees like the giraffe, evolution gave us the ability to stand up right. When mammoths were attacking us, we were given five flexible fingers to grab weapons. This would suggest perhaps maybe evolution has no ending possibilities. Perhaps evolution will give us the ability for mind powers. Perhaps that is our next gift. I mean, what else can we evolve? Theory #4: Biblical Perhaps there is a creator of our existence. Maybe there is a God? Maybe we are entrapped spirits, kept away from the spiritual war that is happening in another dimension. Maybe we are slaves for a bigger source. Maybe we are prisoners for a good reason. Maybe we chose this life before we were born. Maybe there are many choices. Maybe we got tired of the magical world, and wanted to have a life without the unfair advantages. People with great magical powers, coming into your house, raping your woman, killing your child, and cutting your balls off, just because they wanted to. And believe me, in reality, if people knew that they could become powerful and magical that would happen. If this were a plausible theory, then reincarnation probability would have a step up. >>> There are so many theories, I will think up more of them, but for now, I have a job interview I have to get to. Give me your comments, suggestions, and even your own theories if you have them. |
| Posted By: Zack Posted On: Jun 10, 2005 Views: 1508 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Opps I did not mean to add the '> Keith' line. The whole topic is for everyone |
| Posted By: big al carson Posted On: Jun 10, 2005 Views: 1501 | RE: Humanity; our begining. you need to spell "beginning" right nigga |
| Posted By: Zack Posted On: Jun 11, 2005 Views: 1497 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Yeah, I realized that right after I posted it, didn't think it would be too much of a problem... Unless of course you just like being an asshole. |
| Posted By: Random1 Posted On: Jun 12, 2005 Views: 1492 | RE: Humanity; our begining. oh man, I want to respond in depth to your post Zack, but I am to lazy.. so perhaps I will wait a few days :-) |
| Posted By: Hugh Jazz Posted On: Jun 13, 2005 Views: 1488 | RE: Humanity; our begining. yo nigga this damn message board dont even talk about telekinesis anymore |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1474 | RE: Humanity; our begining. I don't think it is the message board. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1471 | RE: Humanity; our begining. I have a theory. Why surround the subject matter of telekinesis when you can't pinpoint the definition of it? Why offend people in the physical world who have it unproven, with words that will never get-(be) anywhere useful enough? I, for every intention, demand an actual interview between Keith Mayes and James Conrad. The astronomer versus the physicist. I demand answers of what is in between the one and the many. For either of the two unproven telekinetic powers, for either of the two known men (besides Uri Geller -questionable- ), why not struggle with this unending pain that proof bears down upon us all? What burden Keith Mayes? What passion? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1469 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Passion. Burden. Me. What about you? What about Zack? Well, Zack, go back to your first question from earlier,"what is the connnection?". Are you so much into the computer world that you don't know already?. You word things about video games, and humanity, these things that you don't understand that are purposely put here on this message board for a reason. Did you ever try the RPG 'Ultima'? It will suck you out of here, I assure you. I don't play that game. I hear much about it from people. Take some advice Zack, stay with the subject matter. The RAW, UNCUT, CONCRETE, UNDENIABLE, MYSTERIOUS, EXTRA-ORDINARY, AND DOWN RIGHT ASTONISHING SUBJECT MATTER, that is telekinesis. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1468 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Public service...PFFFFT. Public service?!?!? Do me a public service. Define the difference between internal and external telekinesis. In the observable universe. Without one physical thing being moved, except the electricity in a device indicating all forms of magnetism in the human body. Not one physical thing, that you cannot touch. CAN NOT, WILL NOT touch. -----------I didn't ask for the definition of telekinesis. I asked for the definition between internal and external telekinesis. Any time Mr. Mayes on this very message board says it doesn't exist, it contradicts the opening page. I mean it. The 'Keith Mayes' on the opening page mentions not ONE word of non-existing undefineable telekinesis. The other, here running around like a jack-ass, says it doesn't exist and that 'they' know all they need to. They don't. ---------------------Imposter.-----------Consider your ass KICKED. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1467 | RE: Humanity; our begining. -------------------TK----------------------------- -----------------ITK----------------------------- -----------------ETK----------------------------- Positive, negative, neutral. Definition. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 1464 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Warm air, or static? Which one? Is it one, or the other? Why say you proved anything with two. There is the One and there is the Many. Choose. Tell us all which one it was. Tell me. I have two hands, and two eyes. I have two halves of my brain to use. What passion are you talking about? |
| Posted By: Zack Posted On: Jun 15, 2005 Views: 1456 | RE: Humanity; our begining. Female Orgasms Before You Get Started Some women seem to have an incredibly difficult time reaching orgasm during intercourse; that is if they are able to orgasm at all. The most common reason for this is that they dont know their own bodies. Society has had this brilliant effect of instilling into our minds from childhood that masturbation is sinful, wrong and dirty. Well, everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, but all common sense dictates that this couldnt be farther from the truth. Thanks to this misconception, many people, especially women, have stopped themselves from learning their bodies, thereby reducing the chances of being able to fully enjoy sex. It is hard for many women to unlearn all that they have been taught, and they often feel that touching themselves does not bring pleasure. There is some truth behind that - they are not lying, they do not feel pleasure. However, this is not because there is no pleasure to be felt, just that they have been indirectly taught to not enjoy it. Getting beyond this will take time and patience, so never rush your partner. If your woman has never had an orgasm (this is often the case if they say, I think Ive had one), you will want to refer to the female masturbation article to get things started. Learning to please a woman who cant orgasm on her own is extremely difficult, so we highly suggest that you start with getting her to play with herself, and allow her to learn how her body reacts to different stimulus. The last note has to do with your approach. Orgasms cant be forced, and the more pressure you put on her to cum, the less likely it is to happen. Take things slow, learn techniques, experiment with them and find what works. If you start getting frustrated when you arent seeing results, it will show, and unfortunately make it even harder. Sex is supposed to be fun and enjoyable - as soon as you make it too serious, it takes away from the pleasure! About Orgasms There are two major types of orgasms a women can have clitoral and G spot, otherwise known as vaginal orgasms. When masturbating, women usually learn to get themselves off using their clitoris. There is nothing wrong with that, but it leaves the whole world of vaginal orgasms untapped. Many women are unable to climax during intercourse, as they arent familiar enough with the stimulation to enjoy it to its fullest extent. While you learn to read your partners body signs, it never hurts to ask a question, especially if you are trying new techniques. Coitus, commonly known as vaginal sex, can be one of the clumsiest ways to stimulate a woman, if done without thought. While it does provide an atmosphere that can be highly arousing, emotionally satisfying and erotic, the degree of stimulation to the woman's clitoral area is nothing compared to masturbation or cunnilingus. One can incorporate manual stimulation to the clitoris during sex, but this is not very necessary if your woman has had vaginal orgasms in the past, and if you know how to hit the g spot correctly. To learn more about positions and the g spot, please refer to the g spot article and positions section. No one wants to involve geometry into sex, but it is wise to know which positions stimulate the G spot the best. In order to help her achieve a vaginal orgasm, you need to make sure you are hitting the G spot with each stroke. Many men fantasize about the myth of female ejaculation. Well, for starters, its no myth, most women should theoretically be able to have them. The key is g spot stimulation, but all of this is well described in the article on female ejaculation. Some Ideas on Getting Her There: First of, we would like to remind you to relax, and not to make her orgasm the purpose behind the encounter. The more of a goal you make it; the less likely it is that it will happen. Relax and enjoy yourselves, as that is the most important part. The Grind During Intercourse, you want to increase the pressure exerted on the woman's clitoris. This can be accomplished by rotating your hips just like when you are "grinding" on a dance floor. Try to really push against the front of her groin with the area just above the penis. Rocking back and forth or side to side is a really good way of getting started. Rule of Thumb With the woman sitting on top, the man should lie flat on his back, pelvic tilted upward, and stomach muscles tightened. You want to arch your hips upwards to improve the quality of the Grind; this can be achieved easily by putting a pillow under the mans bum. He then should put his hand over the womans pubic region, and place his thumb on the womans clitoris. While the woman is riding her partner, he can simultaneously stimulate her clitoris. T Position With the woman lying on her back, the man should lie perpendicularly (i.e., at a right angle to her, thus forming the T), while straddling the womans far leg. Depending on the womans flexibility, this can be a great position for deep penetration, while exposing the clitoris for manual stimulation. This double stimulation is very gratifying and can often lead to the big O really quickly. The Maximizer The woman lies on her back, legs tightly held together. The man lies on top, or stands/kneels, in front. Instead of being directly in line with her, the man should be at a slight diagonal. Both of her legs should be over one shoulder, or on one side, of his body; he should begin penetration. This position is designed to maximize female clitoral stimulation and is easiest to perform with the man standing or kneeling (i.e. the woman should have her legs hanging off a counter, couch or bed). Using Sex Toys Sex toys can be used in virtually any sexual position, and thanks to the creative people who design toys, if you can think of a toy, chances are its already made. Feel free to visit our online store to view all of the products, or follow the links below to find products designed to increase stimulation during intercourse. If you have never used a sex toy, you can read our article on using vibrators and our article on sex toy care. Vibrating Clitoral Suckers This class of products works as follows: put the cup part of the toy over the clitoral area, squeeze the pump a couple times to build up some suction, then turn on the vibrating egg, which is generally attached to the cup. The suction is great because it draws more blood to the clitoris, making it more sensitive, as well as it keeps the toy hands free. It can be used during intercourse to add incredible sensations, but some varieties may prove a little bulky for some positions. Click here to check out the selection. Regular Vibrators For those of you who are looking for something with a little more functionality, we recommend getting a regular vibrator. The can be held in place during intercourse to stimulate whatever you want, they can be inserted anally, and can be used on their own as well. They are available in a wide variety of shapes, sizes, and purposes. Click here to check out the selection. Vibrating Cock Rings This class of products is ingenious! The toy is basically a ring with one or more vibrating eggs attached. Simply slide it down the shaft of the penis, turn on the vibrating eggs, and voila, super pleasure for both parties. Click here to check out the selection. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 15, 2005 Views: 1454 | RE: Humanity; our begining. I thought the whole "good sex" thing was booted off the message board for a reason. It was just as bad as "How Keith can get a life.". Which I am suprized is not closed yet. You, Zack, are disturbed. You said I was 'disturbing'. Ghees! What happened? Did you break up with your girlfreind? I was trying to get all the imposters out of this board as much as possible. You have to understand something, (Zack or someone pretty frustrated sexually), this is about telekinesis here. There is no male nor female in connection in this controversy of telekinesis. No one points out male from female in the "connection". It hasn't been determined to even be either of the two, to ever exist in humanity. If you are Zack, go back to your question of connection. Like I said before. The whole issue of you describing telekinesis is part of some 'explosion' in the body, that I agree with. But, orgasm? No. I am working with the issue that this is about near physical death in controlled conditions. |
| Posted By: Hell Posted On: Jun 15, 2005 Views: 1452 | RE: Humanity; our begining. It's people like you that make people not believe in TK. You make up all sorts of spiritual crap, and where it comes from, and all sorts of other ****. It makes you sound like you have problems, like those gay-ass fortune teller ****ters. I know your' statement had absolutely nothing to do with TK, but it's statements like those that make people think that TKers are crazy. |
| Pages [ 1 2 ] Next Page -> |