Total Comments 33

Post Info

Comment

Posted By: Jeff Posted On: Jul 31, 2005 Views: 2920	my opinion Rob, just my opinion, but each girl needs to be shot completely nude in at least one scene. Nothing is hotter than that. In the past, two many girls were wearing a bra, or panties or pants that weren't completely off the body. Fortunately, I've been seeing more completely-nude scenes recently. Although, there is something about a girl wearing nothing but a short skirt (without underwear) that is very sexy too. And one more thing - more shower/bathtub scenes!
Posted By: Josh Posted On: Jul 31, 2005 Views: 2928	Insane Gabriella That last Gabriella update was insane! She is so free and easy with her body. Absolutely no inhibitions. I would loved to see her do a girl-girl, preferably in Europe where they could do even more wild stuff in public with less risk. Imagine the possibilities!
Posted By: Abzzz Posted On: Jul 30, 2005 Views: 3000	chloe and sophie are really good!! their set is very intense. i've just finished watching it again and i have to say that i'm not very surprised they're on top. chloe & sophia have nice bodies and they are cute:) in many of the rest of girl-girl couples one model is pretty but the other is 'average' [not so beautiful or does not suit perfectly to her partner] But still the most important is action! Chloe and Sophia do not spare kisses and hugs, they do it very spontaneous without hesitation. Of course, there other good gg shots - penny and jen, paulina and carla, kim and nikki and few more, many of them can pretend to be on the top.
Posted By: Ed Posted On: Jul 29, 2005 Views: 3029	Upcoming Great upcoming list. Amy, Isabella, and Jamie are three of my favorites, so glad to see them coming back. They have great bodies, fantastic smiles and super personalities. PS I know Nicola is not quite in their league but she had a lot going for her and I wish you would give her another shot.
Posted By: FTVGirls - Rob Posted On: Jul 29, 2005 Views: 3046	feedback, opinions Man, I still can't believe that the Chloe/Sophia video is on top -- its nice and everything, but there are so many better gg videos listed. Extreme frenzy... aargggh. To Dave: Both Violet and Karlie I will be bringing back, either in solo or girl/girl. Kimmie on the other hand, didn't end up being so popular. Nicola: I donno for now.... working on Amy, Lisa, Isabella, and Jamie returns. To Me Again: Don't worry, all the unique stuffing and extreme stuff will be there, including the FTV toy, that's not going anywhere. I'm hoping to get Lia to help in a 'vibrator special' on a girl, and make her orgasm. We shall see. But with Alison assisting a lot more as well, she is less timid, and chances are she will be more 'hands on' than violet or lia. She's heading with me to Portugal on the 1st, and will be quite 'interactive' with the model. To Jean: Too bad you aren't my neighbour then. So far, I haven't had any emails from interested persons -- I'll keep that request/note up for two weeks and see what happens. But good fantasy nonetheless....
Posted By: Jean Posted On: Jul 28, 2005 Views: 3086	My Fantasy... Hi Rob, Regarding a nice house for an FTV shoot? Here is my fantasy! (Theoretical of course)... Firstly, if I could, I would build a nice house right next to yours, and you could shoot your models anytime in my house...You can park your Mercedes in my drive way too...Then again if I could afford that house, I'd probably have my own Mecedes parked there... Secondly, I would invite some members every time you have new models, and throw a party, and make sure that the members really get to know the models well...Members would bring the beer, and models would bring their friends... Thirdly, Violet and Allison would be welcome to my house anytime, with the conditions that Violets butt is bare and Allisons gorgeous boobs are hanging out...Lia can only come, if the three of them make out... And of course the whole thing would be done in the same professional and tasteful way that FTV is done... We could call the sister website "FTV with GND", First Time Video with Girl Next Door. Probably the worst idea ever... BTW, looking forward to the shoots from Portugal...
Posted By: me again Posted On: Jul 26, 2005 Views: 3144	two girls Rob: more exciting than a lesbian show, i think a shot where a girl totally dressed interact with the model is ultra hot, for excample when Violet helps giving breast massage to celine. . please, just please don't forget to include panty stuffing, golf balls, cucumber, fist, and the famous FTV toy in your movies. congratulations for your new Mercedes, i hope you enjoy it ! one request: i'd love to see Lia helping an other model to cum
Posted By: HJ Posted On: Jul 26, 2005 Views: 3164	Nicola I agree about Nicola. I think she is incredibly hot.
Posted By: Justin Posted On: Jul 25, 2005 Views: 3166	Nicola Hey, I was just wondering if you guys ever made a decision about Nicola about whether to bring her back or not, or if you've been in contact with her recently, i would love to see her back, she's absolutely amazing!!
Posted By: Dave Guerrellii Posted On: Jul 24, 2005 Views: 3179	There is a God; Violet be thy Name Hye Rob, Will there ever be another Violet shoot? Not only is she amazingly hot, but her personality makes her even hotter. Thanks man and keep of the great work. And oh yeah, I would love to see more of Karlie and Kimmie. I would love it even more to see them in a girl/girl, either together or seperate.
Posted By: FTVGirls - Rob Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 3379	feedback #2 Murdock & Flair: Well, this is kind of cool, the first debate on the FTV semi-message board. To summarize though, whatever the fetish tastes, the focus is on real, natural masturbation to orgasm, so if you are a foot guy, a big toy guy, a breast massage guy, a stocking guy, I try to get all that in there, it just all depends on the girl, and her own passions. That way, its much more interesting, and it doesn't feel 'forced'. My personal take on foot/stocking fetish: I'm not big on stocking on young women, I feel its almost an older-woman thing, but just my opinion. If a girl comes with stockings, I will shoot it. Foot-wise, I've always liked open-toed strappy heels, but I'll shoot the feet if they aren't too messed up or ugly. Some girls really have nice feet, and it doesn't turn me on, but I appreciate it and it makes the whole figure/image even more erotic. Just like fine hands & feet over big man hands & feet.... If anyone cares to know my personal fetish, its big, natural breasts, especially on long haired brunettes hehe. My favorite girl of all time (wish I could shoot her) is Ewa Sonnet of www.busty.pl ... I'd so be in heaven with an FTV shoot of her! To Jean: I've seen Sapphic Erotica, but never been a member of it before. People compare our sites, but their niche is gg, mine is solo girl. If anything, I don't like pairing up random girls together, I prefer girls who genuinely like and lust over each other. And more than two girls together becomes more of a 'show' than an erotic scene (for me anyways). Lastly, Sapphic has its girls mostly from Eastern Europe (shot there), which makes a tremendous difference in cost as opposed to shooting 3,4, or 5 girls here at once. Lastly number two, my shoots are longer, and more intensive in general, with many location changes, and that is virtually impossible to do with so many girls at once. A lot of owners take pride in their websites, but they outsource everything, from the shoots, to the editing, down to even the customer service. I honestly don't see any skill in that short of being a general manager.
Posted By: Murdock Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 3399	Fetish fet·ish also fet·ich n. Something, such as a material object or a nonsexual part of the body, that arouses sexual desire and may become necessary for sexual gratification. In this context sexual body parts include breasts and genitalia. If you'd like to continue to redefine terms that's fine, we can debate what the definition of "is" is, if you'd like. I'm not even sure what the point of this conversation is, or what point you're trying to make. My point is: I see nothing wrong, nor unusual with FTV (or any other) models wearing stockings or other legware. If you think it's cliché, passé, or just plain tiresome, get over yourself. It's not like a vast majority of the material available here consists of such scenes. I don't care for panty stuffing, but I acknowldge some people do. I don't go complaining about it, nor do I try to come off in some pious manner touting, "My fetish/partialism/prefernce/hankerin'/WhateverYouWantToCallIt is better than your's." and state my opinion as if it were fact. As for me "speaking for myself" I posted my source for 749,000 references to "foot fetish" If you can dig up 749,001 refernces that declare otherwise, you can speak you yourelf. If you're that obsessive about open strap shoes vs. legware, by all means go find some great models and start your own website. If you produce high quality material and charge a reasonable rate then I'll be your first subscriber, otherwise I'll continue to download the great stuff available here.
Posted By: flair Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 3395	Hosiery III Perhaps some definitions would help here. A fetish is a preference for an object, such as whip, a paddle, hosiery, lingerie, hosiery (I repeat it just for fun) and others. Partialism is a preference (but does not have to be) for a part of the body. So correctly speaking you do not speak of a foot fetish except in informal terms. Why it came to be a fetish may have to do with the struggle for making most parts of the female body eventually an object of beauty. First it was because the sex organs are also excretory organs, then it was because hygiene left a lot to be desired. But the point is that many people still have unnecessary hangups about cetain female body parts. This is what people must get over. In our times, contrary to the prior age of porn, "pussies" are mostly shaved and kept, many women pay attention to their feet like never before. Even the female "asshole" has become an object of worship. So one can like a body part such as a foot IN ADDITION to the rest of a female body. Thus it is not necesarilly "fetishistic" except in an informal or playful definition, much less strange. Finally, as to"most of the world..." considering the female foot as a non-sexual body part, speak for yourself my friend.At this point it should be obvious to you when you see a girl in open high heels that she is not suffering or risking injury because of non-sexual reasons. Long live FTV.
Posted By: Murdock Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 3352	Erotica II I have no shame in calling it porn. My point was that you were confusing erotica and porn. I never said there was anything wrong with either. The point you are trying to make seems obvious to you becasue it is a subjective matter. Most of the sites I've seen that specialize in hosiery tend to have models with above average to fantastic legs. A quick google search of "Foot Fetish" returned 749,000 results. Despite your opinion on the matter, I believe that most of the world still considers the foot to be a non sexual body part, thus making it a fetish. No shame in saying it. Get over it.
Posted By: flair Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 3387	Hosiery ll This is the problem with American Porn. And, my friend, it is porn. Porn can be very erotic and agreeable to the eyes or even artistic sense, but it is still Porn. No shame in saying it, get over it. FTV for example (when it gets it right, which is often) is very beautiful porn. So, back to the hosiery issue. That someone could not see the obvious point that hosiery is used primarily to enhance/ conceal imperfect legs is understandable considering porn has (until Viv Thomas) also accepted tongue-snaking passing as kissing. Another point to remember is that Feet becoming an accepted sex object goes along with sexual liberation and evolution. It is not just a "fetish" such as hosiery -which by the way , is kink of the hose, not the leg, while open strapped heels still worship a female part, not conceal it.

Pages [ 1 2 3 ] Next Page ->