Total Comments 11 | Start A New Comment

Post Info

Comment

Posted By: AsiaAnn Posted On: Jul 4, 2009 Views: 497	No Choice I chose the last one but not really. All the other choices were VERY lame to me. I like Starr, but she's been a pain for a couple of years now. Whine, whine, whine~!!! I would like her and Cole to really work thru their problems and become a supercouple. SOMEBODY has to stay together, it does happen. GET RID OF STACY!!!
Posted By: Jackie Posted On: Jun 29, 2009 Views: 499	Starr I'm tired of seeing her and her family. The problem was created when the writer's decided to do the baby switch s/l. I enjoyed watching Starr and Cole having to grow up and make adult choices. Starr's choice to give up Hope was one that I was looking forward to seeing. To see a young woman go through a pregnancy(and all the drama that brings) and at the end giving up her child. OLTL had a gem with the s/l. Then it was turned into a hot mess. Jessica should have been allowed to have her child live. She had already lost Nash. So why kill her baby? It was a bad move on the behalf of the writer's. After months of this s/l. We were in full Starr and Cole overload. I don't want to watch them raise Hope. I am tired of seeing them on my screen. If the writer's wanted to have them end up raising Hope together why go through this drama that wasn't needed? They could have created drama without killing Jessica's baby or the baby switch. The so called happy ending was predictable and useless. Everyone knew that Marcy was going to end up pregnant after giving Hope back. It's sad that writer's today can't write story's to keep up with the fans. Some of us are tired of the same predictable/lame s/l's. We want writer's to write s/l's that don't insult us as viewers.
Posted By: Belle Posted On: Jun 27, 2009 Views: 560	Nancy I'm 55. Sex wasn't discussed at all. However teen girls in my school got pregnant. If anyone was suddenly "visiting relatives in Calif.", it meant they were pregnant and living in a home for unwed mothers with the nuns. The baby was then given up for adoption. I agree that Starr and Cole should be shown raising Hope. Get rid of Stacy!!!!!!!
Posted By: Mark Posted On: Jun 24, 2009 Views: 499	Front burner vs. back burner Front burner: Viki, Dorian, Charlie, Addie, Brody, Todd, Tea, Marty, Carlotta, Rachel, Greg, Shawn, Matthew, Destiny, Jack, Sam, Langston, Markko, Aurelia, Oliver, Kyle, Schuyler Mid-burner: Rex, Bo, Nora, Layla Back burner: Starr (Hope), Cole, Blair, Cristian, Jessica (Bree), Natalie, Jared, John, Gigi, Shane, Stacy They should move heaven and earth to bring back to Llanview: Kevin (for Blair), Joey (to tame Stacy), Zane, Kelly (played by Gina Tognoni), Larry Wolek, his son Danny, Andrew, Cassie and River. Just my opinion.
Posted By: nancy Posted On: Jun 23, 2009 Views: 544	OLTL Show starr and cole and hope and leave off the screen christian layla whiny natalie and jared rex gigi stacy roxy love sole, john matthew langston marrko and I like Shawn and Rachel
Posted By: Nancy Posted On: Jun 23, 2009 Views: 483	Starr and Cole WHen I grew up in school I am now 54 years old talking about sex was completely taboo. And you did not hear anything about it in health class. That was something for your doctor to go over with you or your parents. TOday now things are completely different. Sex is all you hear. My 11th grade daughter had 4 or 5 young girls in her classes who were expecting. I am an avid watcher of SOLe if they are not on I do not tune in. They had unprotected sex got pregnant went for adoption or starr did because she was trying to get back at her dad for all the heartache for Marcie. IF you can take the responsiblity to have uprotected sex then you can take the responsibility to become a family and raise your child. And starr and Cole are the perfect teen couple for this. show a realistic view of teens raising a child.
Posted By: Christine Posted On: Jun 23, 2009 Views: 401	Starr/Cole I hate Starr and Cole and always have since day 1. This whole lets have them have sex and make a baby storyline, totally destroyed Todd and alienated him completely from his family. Now Todd, Tea, Blair, John and Marty have all become nothing but useless props for the Starr/Cole storyline. It's time to send these two packing along with Marko and Langston and give the show back to the adults. The show has turned into a PSA, now they're advocating teen sex!
Posted By: Pat Posted On: Jun 22, 2009 Views: 383	Gigi/Rex?Stacey future ? So, Rex and Stacey have sex and Stacey becomes (surprise) pregnant. The child becomes the perfect donor match for Shane. TPTB hoping that all will be forgiven to save the character. This fan hopes that the baby lives, Stacey dies in childbirth , and Gigi and Rex raise the new child along with Shane. "Karma in motion ". Now, I can forgive the writers for writing such a disgusting "sex for cells" storyline to save a child.
Posted By: Mason Posted On: Jun 22, 2009 Views: 432	Starr I am soooo sick of Starr (and Cole). There ARE other characters on the show, and plenty of them could do with frontburner stories. As far as Starr as concerned, have her jump off a cliff, for all I care. I just don't want to see her on my screen anymore.
Posted By: long time viewer Posted On: Jun 22, 2009 Views: 385	Starr's next storyline Yes, Starr has been on quite a bit, but I don't mind the character. I'd love for her, Cole & the baby to go on the run this summer, so that Cole can avoid jail time. Unless they plan to get rid of Cole, I seriously doubt he will really go to jail. Starr & Cole are 2 of the more watchable characters on there. As far as I'm concerned, keep giving them a lot of airtime & get rid of Tea & Stacy, they are annoying.
Posted By: Bella Posted On: Jun 22, 2009 Views: 364	Starr Put her ass on the back burner already. She has taken up way too much airtime already.