| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> Moon Landings | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Moon Landings |
| Posted By: Martin Posted On: Jan 27, 2003 Views: 918 | Moon Landings Most vehicles which haven't been superceeded yet were designed in the sixties. Boeing 747 - still the largest plane. Concorde - still the only supersonic large passenger plane (now past it's use-by-date I know). the point I'm making is when do people really think we gained all our hi-tech capabillity? Recently? No way! Each generation thinks theirs is the hi-tech one, previous ones being old-fasioned. The reason why we have LCD displays is because they needed instruments that would work in space. Everything we use has a history. If not already done, this site should include all the things we gained from the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo missions. Some of the pictures may be suspect but actual faked Moon Landings - not a chance. I do believe we have been lied to about many things in history but not this one. I look forward to seeing pictures of the moon landers taken from more powerfull telescopes. As far as I know Neil Armstrong is still with us, and so it would be nice for him, to know that we all know the truth. And have some respect. |
| Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon! Posted On: Feb 22, 2003 Views: 884 | RE: Moon Landings Good point! But tough look for looking forward to the Trailblazer and Selene pictures of the landing sites. Bart Sibrel and bart hess and other idiot conspiratists will say they faked those pictures, too. And why the hell wouldn't they? They still think there's only one light source, they still don't know the properties of the moon, they still are too lazy to move their ass and read a physics book, so they'll see the same 'discrepancies,' because they're there, just not discrepancies. Essentially, they still think 1+1=11 |