| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> "Before we can travel.... | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: "Before we can travel.... |
| Posted By: Bart Hess Posted On: Feb 18, 2003 Views: 1053 | "Before we can travel.... ...beyond earth's atmoshpere,we must conquer the hazardous radiation environment of space." -Sean O'Keefe, NASA Administrator,2002 I guess he forgot about Apollo going to the Moon all those times,eh? This poor shmuck opened his pie-hole when he shouldn't have. Oops. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 19, 2003 Views: 1045 | RE: "Before we can travel.... You are the poor shmuck that opened his pie-hole when he shouldn't have. You have already proved that you are unable to defend your own LIES. This is yet ANOTHER smokescreen. You haven't answered the 'no stars in the sky' claim yet, and as I said, we are not moving on until you do. We are not going to fall for your tired old trick of making false accusations and then hiding behind even more to avoid revealing your own LIES. What is the the point in talking to an idiotic LIAR??? Your stupid thoughts are juvenile and worthless. Here is a reminder of your previous LIES, as you seem to have forgotten. This is what I said to you:- "Anyway, I have answered all your daft points on this one, and I say YOU ARE A LIAR. To prove me wrong you need to: 1) Send me the photo with the stars that compares with the ones on the Moon. 2) Prove that ALL the photos were perfect 3) Prove that it was the astronaut's perfect ligning up of all those panoramic shots and not a lab back on Earth. 4) Explain your claim that KODAK say the pictures cant be done - and give the Kodak URL WHERE THEY SAY THIS - when in fact they have an official website showing exactly how it WAS done." AS I HAVE SAID, EITHER ANSWER YOUR LIES OR SHUT UP, WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN ANY MORE THOUGHTS OF A STUPID LIAR. Run along and do your homework kid. You are really making a terrible example of hoax believers, and making yourself look more ridiculous with every stupid lying remark you make. |
| Posted By: Bart Hess Posted On: Feb 20, 2003 Views: 1021 | RE: "Before we can travel.... 1. Anybody can take photos of the stars(well,except astro-NOTS!). I've done it.Instead of sending you a photo,why don't you look at the thousands-if not millions of photos out there(not by nasa of course!).Quit being an idiot.Just because nasa told you it's not possible don't let that affect your common sense(if you have any,MORON). 2. Explain the artificial lighting and shadows that defy physics. What about the same sets used in different "missions" hundreds of miles away from each other. Why don't the video and photos match? Just a few questions for you to answer. 3. Astro-NOTS couldn't have lined up perfect shots because they had no viewfinders on those cameras. Hey,by the way,how did they change filters,film,lenses, and make adjustments with those pressurized gloves anyway? 4. Here's the kicker: Kodak Kare An Eastman Kodak brochure from the 60's Protection from x-rays In hospitals,industrial plants,and laboritories,ALL FILMS,regardless of the type of packing,must be protected from X-rays,radium,and other radioactive materials.For example,films stored 25 feet away from 100 milligrams of radium require the protection of THREE AND ONE HALF INCHES of lead around the radium, An Eastman Kodak brochure from the 1990's: PROTECT FILM FROM X-RAYS X-Rays can fog unprocessed film when the level of radiation is high or when the film receives several low-level doses,because the effects of X-Ray exposures are cumulative. I guess the Moon doesn't count. Got you there! Boo-Ya! Keith,go to school.Get an education.You obviously don't know JACK about science. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 20, 2003 Views: 1010 | RE: "Before we can travel.... 1) So you are unable to send YOUR photo of the stars. I see, how very surprising, I wonder why that is? Hmmmm... Okay, give just ONE URL that shows the stars in a photo as they would appear in the conditions on the Moon. So we need a dark sky of course - with stars - a brightly lit surface with a brightly lit person in the foreground. Should be easy for you! Just ONE from the MILLIONS that you claim to have seen. Odd that, I have not seen ANY. Should be interesting. I wonder what reason you will give for being unable to do that? 2) Give the URL of ONE photo that shows "artificial lighting that defies physics", Just ONE. You are all talk. Whichever one you pick I guarantee that you will once again end up looking stupid! And for the same sets, hundreds of miles apart, with NASA's claim that they are the same place. 3) "Astronauts could not have lined up perfect shots because they had no viewfinder." What an idiot you are! They didn't have to take 'perfect' shots! Take the photo of Aldrin on the surface of the Moon on my main page. In the original photo he may have been squeezed into one little corner of the photo and the whole thing may have been at a crazy angle. It doesn't matter. That stuff is corrected in the darkroom simply by cropping the photo. Have you no brain at all you stupid jerk. Bye the way, "how did they change filters, film, lenses and make adjustments with those pressurized gloves anyway?" Don't you know ANYTHING. They did not do ANY of those thing! How could they with those gloves on? What makes you think they did? 4) KODAK. Oh dear oh dear. You start of by saying that photos could not possibly be taken on the Moon because the film couldn't work under those conditions "even Kodak say its baloney". I called you a liar. I gave you Kodak's own website where they explain how the Apollo 11 crew used Kodak camera and film ON THE MOON! You reply with Kodak advice to keep film away from hospital X-rays and radium! What is it with you? Are you brain damaged? Or is it that you don't have one? I think you don't have one! WHERE HERE DO KODAK SAY THE FILM WILL NOT WORK ON THE MOON? Please point it out to me, I am so silly I cant see it! This is just you stupidly thinking that the conditions on the Moon are the same as standing inside a hospital X-ray machine! Just how dumb can you get? This is very much like the argument that it would take 6 feet of lead shielding to pass safely through the Van Allen belts. This amount of lead would protect you from a Hiroshima size thermonuclear bomb! Check out my page 'Van Allen belts' and TRY to learn something about radiation before you make yourself look even more stupid than you already have. Better still, why don't you just give up this nonsense because at every turn you are shown to be a real dumb no-nothing jerk. "spacesuits can't possibly work". Better tell that to the astronauts that do EVAs on the ISS and the HST, and the old MIR. They should all have died according to you! Go away and study the subject. |
| Posted By: we did 2 land on the moon! Posted On: Feb 21, 2003 Views: 973 | To: bart You can take photos of stars, eh? Can you take photos of stars from THE MOON? No, I don't think so, because you'd have to get a camera with fast exposure, something you can't afford nor understand, so why bother? NASA did not tell Keith the information he puts on his website. That was told to him by textbooks and science, which came from people like Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton. They're famous people, in case you haven't heard of them, oh wait, you haven't, your still in that neanderthal cave of yours licking maggots. Your information, on the other hand, was told to you by assorted 3rd party websites and TV and radio. Hmm...whom to trust? Gossip, or Einstein? You'd go with gossip; it's all you neanderthals grunt and hoot about. As for that Sean O'Keefe quote...why don't you explain the pair of '...' in the middle? Are you leaving something out? specifically... *phew* I've just spent an hour looking for that quote using everything from "Sean O'Keefe" to "Sean O'Keefe radiation March 26 2002" and you know what, it's nowhere to be found. Anotherlie? YOU DON'T KNOW JACK ABOUT SCIENCE! THERE IS NO ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING! IT's FROM ANOTHER LIGHT SOURCE-THE EARTH! DAMN YOU DUMBASSES! *er, excuse me, but that just happens to be true* why don't you do us all a favor, bart, and SHUT UP |
| Posted By: Bart1972 Posted On: Feb 21, 2003 Views: 967 | RE: "Before we can travel.... You spent an hour and couldn't find it? LMAO!! Maybe you should check your spelling... No wonder you can't grasp basic physics-you can't even work your comp! You should apply for a job with nasa(if you don't already work there). Maybe you could be the guy who throws pieces of foam at the shuttle! They never had those problems with Apollo 35 years ago.Those guys went to the Moon and back SEVERAL times! Must be easier to do that with technology 35 years ago than put a shuttle in LOW EARTH ORBIT. OOPS!! "heroes"....please. |
| Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon Posted On: Feb 21, 2003 Views: 964 | RE: "Before we can travel.... why don't you look in your physics book and then reply? btw, i believe i told you to SHUT UP. If you can read, SHUT UP means...well, if you can't read, then, you won't get that either. No, it's not that I can't work the computer. I'm on dialup and Google kept showing error messages.Why don't you give us the full quote? Oh wait - SHUT UP |
| Posted By: we did 2 go to the mean Posted On: Feb 21, 2003 Views: 963 | endnote just to let you know, i can work my computer perfectly well. you on the other hand, are still in your neanderthal cave, licking maggots as usual, hooting and pointing at the moon and thinking it's a ball of string NASA put up there. Yeah, maybe i will apply for a job at NASA. As if they're evil? Without them, you wouldn't know jack about anything space. |
| Posted By: Bart Posted On: Feb 21, 2003 Views: 959 | RE: "Before we can travel.... 'Dial-up"? Step into the 21st century,sissy. With that level of technology you should be able to make SEVERAL trips to the Moon and back. In 2003. Or at least enjoy the luxuries of your cave. Do you have running water,or did Mommy forget to pay the bill? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Mar 5, 2003 Views: 918 | RE: "Before we can travel.... So once again, poor old Bart (LMAO) Hess, unable to come up with any answers, drifts away to get a few more questions from his all-time great hero, Bart Sibrel, to hide behind. How many more times do you intend to make yourself look stupid Bart? Enough already! |