THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> disprove OUR statements!Start A New Topic | Reply
Post InfoTOPIC: disprove OUR statements!
Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon!

Posted On: Feb 22, 2003
Views: 1137
disprove OUR statements!

hey you no-moonies! (bart and the giant woolly mammoth, i mean you people especially)

we're tired of explaining, over and over, why your evidence is wrong. It might be, it might not be, let's just leave it at that, ok?

Now disprove OUR evidence with scientifical backup!

Specifically:
1)Explain 400kg of lunar rock
2)Explain why all other countries , esp. Russia, didn't see it back then
3)Explain why you are so damn smart and can find the clues when the most respected scientists in the world, of every discipline, failed to do it earlier.


Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon!

Posted On: Feb 23, 2003
Views: 1128
At a loss of words?

Thought so. Or are you too damn stupid?
d) all of the above.

And while your at it, Bart and Bart, why don't you answer why NASA would fake extensive training when it didn't really have to be that expensive? Why? What's NASA's motive?


Posted By: Bart

Posted On: Feb 23, 2003
Views: 1124
RE: disprove OUR statements!

I love it when you idiots bring up the "moon rocks" as if that is going to answer all those unanswered questions.This should shut you up:
The Soviets also claim to have moon rocks-although they obtained them with UNMANNED LANDERS.
Is it possible to create "moon rocks" in a laboratory?
Keith,are you able to tell the difference between a moon rock and something found here?-Or is nasa's word enough?(LMAO!!)
Didn't a large amount of "moon rocks" get discoverd in Antarctica years ago?
Why aren't non-nasa scientists allowed to analyze and scrutinize these "moon rocks"?

Now,please,PLEASE answer my questions:

What's the deal with the contradicting photo/film footage on ALL the Apollo "missions"?

Explain why the same location sets are used in different "missions" that are several hundred miles apart?

Why is their artificial lighting used on the moon and nasa said there wasn't?I know,I know-"it's the light reflecting off the moon's surface"(LMAO,again!!)

Why didn't Kodak commercialize their magical moon film OVER THIRTY YEARS AGO?If so much technology comes from nasa,why wouldn't Kodak make MILLIONS off this film(and Hasselblad)?

Explain the film footage of Apollo 11 faking the mission as seen on Bart Sibrel's dvd.BTW,nasa won't comment on that either.

Look,morons,I have too many questions and I just want you to come up with explanations for a few.

As for the quote from Sean O'keefe-look it up.
It only took me ten minutes to find it ONLINE.You dumb bastards are too stupid to defend nasa's lies if you can't do research on your own.Quit using nasa'a website as your Bible,sheep.


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Feb 24, 2003
Views: 1116
RE: disprove OUR statements!

Bart, you really are pathetic!
All the stupid points that I have answered of yours have shown you to be wrong every single time, or even that you were telling lies.
Now you come along with another batch and challenge me to answer them.
Bart, I am just not interested in talking to a raving lunatic, it is very tedious.
But just to show why it is so pointess, yet another of your crazy points was "Why aren't non-nasa scientists allowed to analyze and scrutinize these "moon rocks"?"
Oh dear oh dear Bart. The Moon rocks have been studied by hundreds of labs around the world, in many different countries.
And as for refusal to reveal where O'keefe's quote is, have you any idea how juvenile that makes you appear? I mean Bart, you are acting like a 5 year old! If there was such a quote you would paste it up in huge letters, with the source! You are so sad.
And you expect me to answer all your crazy questions? Why should I, you're nuts.
Instead why don't you answer the 8 outstanding questions I put to you under "only a fool would believe". After all, there is no point in moving on until we have cleared up the unfinished questions that you raised. What's the point in adding more questions at this stage? Sort those out then I will answer your other equally daft questions, no problem!


Posted By: Bart

Posted On: Feb 24, 2003
Views: 1104
RE: disprove OUR statements!

Just what I thought....no answers!


Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon!

Posted On: Feb 24, 2003
Views: 1101
RE: Bart, your answers(and a few questions as well

Now, how many kg of moon rock did the Apollo missions supposedly return? 383 kg (that's a good 840 pounds in case you didn't notice. How many kg did the soviets return? i bet you didn't know that it was only a few kg. Now, unmanned landers can't return that load of moon rock. Tell me, how many unmanned landers from the Soviets went to the moon? And how many kg did they return? How many kg of moon rock is there in all? You still have to account for several hundred kg of moon rock. As for the moon rocks in Antarctica...when was this? 1970's or 1990's? When? And I don't believe 800 pounds of moon rock suddenly turned up in Antarctica. Keith and most everyone are unable to tell. But again, these were scrutinized by hundreds of the world's greatest brains in all fields.

NOW, for your QUESTIONS, even though this topic is for OUR QUESTIONS, not YOURS.

What's the deal with the contradicting photo/film footage on ALL the Apollo "missions"?


Explain why the same location sets are used in different "missions" that are several hundred miles apart?


Why is their artificial lighting used on the moon and nasa said there wasn't?I know,I know-"it's the light reflecting off the moon's surface"(LMAO,again!!)


Why didn't Kodak commercialize their magical moon film OVER THIRTY YEARS AGO?If so much technology comes from nasa,why wouldn't Kodak make MILLIONS off this film(and Hasselblad)?


Explain the film footage of Apollo 11 faking the mission as seen on Bart Sibrel's dvd.BTW,nasa won't comment on that either.

Look,morons,I have too many questions and I just want you to come up with explanations for a few.


As for the quote from Sean O'keefe-look it up.
It only took me ten minutes to find it ONLINE.You dumb bastards are too stupid to defend nasa's lies if you can't do research on your own.Quit using nasa'a website as your Bible,sheep.


Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon!

Posted On: Feb 26, 2003
Views: 1083
RE: disprove OUR statements!

juss what i thought! no answers


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Mar 5, 2003
Views: 1075
RE: disprove OUR statements!

You didn't expect any answers did you?
Bart (LMAO) Hess doesn't have any. All he can do is repeat stupid questions that he gets from that moron Bart Sibrel.
Bart Hess doesn't even understand the questions he is asking, let alone come up with an answer!
But hey, he's only a kid.


Posted By: we did 2 go to the moon!

Posted On: Jun 2, 2003
Views: 1069
RE: RE: disprove OUR statements!

kids


 

Theories with Problems