THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> Here's what we have so far...Start A New Topic | Reply
Post InfoTOPIC: Here's what we have so far...
Posted By: Bart

Posted On: Feb 24, 2003
Views: 963
Here's what we have so far...

1.
You admitted the "space" station is in LOW EARTH ORBIT.
Congratulations!
2.
You admit the Van Allen Belt exists.
Your'e getting warmer!
3. You admitted the Soviets have Moon rocks obtained from UNMANNED LANDERS.
Good for you!

But you still insist there is no radiation in space.

Well,you ALMOST understand.
Hey! I got an idea!
Why don't we just send astro-NOTS a hundred miles up in the atmoshere in rockets/modules based on the Apollo designs?
They got them to the Moon and back SEVERAL times OVER THIRTY YEARS AGO!
Helluva lot safer than those 21st century "space shuttles"....
I guess technology was far superior back then.
LMAO!!!!
They didn't have to worry about foam.Ha,ha.


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Feb 25, 2003
Views: 958
RE: Here's what we have so far...

Here is what we REALLY have so far Bart (LMAO) Hess, you seem to keep forgetting.
You raised all the following questions, to which I have replied and shown you to be either wrong, stupid, or a liar. I know you have lots more questions, it is obvious there are many things that you do not understand. But as you asked these questions first, I think it only fair that we deal with them properly before moving on to your other questions, otherwise we will not be able to do justice to any of your daft questions will we?

These are Bart's unfinished questions:-
1) He has been proven to be lying over his Kodak ‘quote’. What do you say Bart?
2) He is of course unable to tell us where O’Keefe’s quote is because it doesn’t exist. Another Bart lie. What do you say Bart?
3) He is unable to submit his photo ‘proving’ that the stars can be photographed from the Moon. I wonder why that could be? Not another Bart lie surely? What do you say Bart?
4) He is unable to explain why spacesuits work just fine in low Earth orbit but couldn’t possibly work on the Moon. What do you say Bart?
5) He claims that spacesuits could not protect astronauts on the Moon from radiation, because it is the same radiation as from a hospital x-ray machine! (That one is probably his most stupid remark so far, but watch this space, I’m sure the cretin can top even that!) What do you say Bart?
6) He believes that all the photos taken by the astronauts were too good to have been taken on the Moon, having seen maybe 100 or so from the 30,000 taken! Bart does not know about photographic darkrooms either, and how to crop a photo. What a jerk! What do you say Bart??
7) He believes that the astronauts changed camera filters, changed lens focus and changed lenses while wearing spacesuits!!!! He then goes on to say it must be a hoax then because they can't do that! Ehhhhhh! Run that by me again..... he believes...oh, never mind. What do you say Bart?

THESE ARE BART (LMAO) HESS'S ARGUMENTS WHY MEN COULD NOT LAND ON THE MOON, AND HE IS UNABLE TO DEFEND ANY OF THEM EVEN THOUGH ALL ARE SHOWN TO BE WRONG, STUPID OR LIES!!!!!

And you want us to answer more? No Bart, let's deal with these first, there's a good boy. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Mar 6, 2003
Views: 901
RE: Here's what we have so far...

So once again poor old Bart (LMAO) Hess is unable to come up with any answers and is once again made to look stupid.
So once again Bart runs off to his all-time great hero Bart Sibrel, to find even more stupid questions to hide behind.
How many more times are you going to make yourself look an idiot Bart?
We already know you are, you have proven this many, many times on this message board.
No need to do it again!


 

Theories with Problems