| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> did we really land on the moon | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: did we really land on the moon |
| Posted By: sreedharreddy Posted On: Aug 10, 2005 Views: 1153 | did we really land on the moon i think we have not really land on the moon because of many reasons.one of my doubt is how the astronauts had withstand deadly radiations coming from sun even though there is no protection layers like ozone on the earth and even though the magnetic field on earth.the images r also seemed like mirror images .why mitchells arms are not visible in some photos and also many photos taken on moon are contradictory. Why isn't there any flame visible when the LM ascent engine fires? and also some photos are seemed to be identical with some contaning the LM vehicle and others not contained in it. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Aug 10, 2005 Views: 1151 | RE: did we really land on the moon If you expect to get answers to those questions then I suggest you go to one of the sites that supports the notion that it was all a hoax. They will be able to supply answers. The answers will however be every bit as stupid as your questions, but hey, it will make you happy. |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Aug 11, 2005 Views: 1146 | RE: did we really land on the moon sreedharreddy I have to say that you and other 'Moon Hoax Believers' just repeat what has been said time and time again. It's like a broking record, if for one second you took on board what this site provides then maybe you would realise some evidence that makes what you believe look a lttle stupid. Instead you post threads on the message board with no understanding of the facts and no intention of trying to research the facts. There are sites that gives information on the points you have pointed out, like keith said why not do a google search and read up on what you have said seems common sense. About what you pointed out, radiation is a big problem in space as it causes a lot of damage but what the astronauts were exposed to was not life threatening. For example when travelling to the moon the astronauts would of had to of gone through the 'Van Allen Belt' where they would of recieved approximately about 1 Rem and it takes about 25 Rem's to cause any symptoms of illness due to radiation and about 500 Rem's to kill you (make you turn green). The astronauts were well aware of the radiation dosage that they would recieve on their travels and no doubt could of done some long term dammage maybe but they were going to the moon i think the risks were within good reason. The picture taken when the LM ascent engine fires is one of the most interesting pictures i find, especially for MHB's. It looks like its floating but its obviously not. As you clearly pointed out it has no flames but there is. We can't see the flame from the lander because the lander rockets used a combination of hydrazine and dinitrogen tetroxide. These are substances that will burn with almost an invisible flame in a vacuum. So there will hardly be a flame seen. This is not hard information to come by, it just takes a bit of research. Most of your other input is on photography and unless you are a photographer you won't understand how complicated it can be. There are many reasons as to why there seems to be errors in pictures and i'm not going to explain as there is to much to know and i can't be assed to right anything about it but this site has good understandable information that will answer your questions. As i've said its not hard to google search! www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax Everything you need to know is on that site and maybe you might let go of the stupid moon hoax theory crap. I doubt it! Your quote, "and also some photos are seemed to be identical with some containing the LM vehicle and others not contained in it." I laughed when i read that, how can you say "seemed to be identical", from this statement alone i can tell you have put no thought into this whole theory. You have seen two picctures that look alike and just assumed they are the same picture. To make matters worse you tried to use this as evidence supporting your theory. Please just do some RESEARCH before making yourself come across as someone to ignorant to find the facts!!! |
| Posted By: misha Posted On: Aug 26, 2006 Views: 917 | RE: did we really land on the moon i thought that in 1969 some peaple land on moon but after knowing that NASA lost the proves,i became surprise.How is it possible?And according to the pictures of moon it is prove tat man never land on moon because there are lots of confussions in the pics now i believe that these are just rumours spread by NASA that once man went to moom but this is not true |