| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> Stuff Left Behind | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Stuff Left Behind |
| Posted By: Rick Posted On: Sep 25, 2005 Views: 1157 | Stuff Left Behind I do think it's a valid point ask, "Why can't we see the equipment left behind?" as proof that NASA landed men and machines on the lunar surface. It's a perfectly reasonable request, and would settle all the conspiracy theories surrounding the moon landings once and for all. But here's the thing: no one would have wanted the US to have faked the moon lands than the Russians, right? Yet they never complain. Why not? You would think they'd be dying to send a lunar orbiter up there to zoom in on the artificial objects left behind (flags, ,landers, footprints, laser apparatus, etc.). I do think private missions like the Trailblazer (if it's for real), will end up settling the score. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Sep 26, 2005 Views: 1151 | RE: Stuff Left Behind Hi Rick, If you read my main page and go to point 7 I explain why the best telescope there currently is - the Hubble Space Telescope - is unable to resolve objects that small on the moon. It may - I stress may - be possible that very soon a ground based telescope will be able to resolve Apollo debris left behind on the lunar service. It consists of three very large telescopes, each with adaptive optics, linked together by computer via fibre optics to create a virtual single telescope many metres across, larger by a huge factor than any other telescope. It may just be able to do it. If that shows the Apollo debris will that convince HB's, or will they just say that the images are fake? Same thing with Trailblazer? |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Sep 27, 2005 Views: 1146 | RE: Stuff Left Behind Deep Breath They will most probably say the photo's are fakes because of the light fading away part of a cross hair or a shadow they can't explain must obviously mean it was shot in a studio. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Sep 27, 2005 Views: 1143 | RE: Stuff Left Behind I think you're right. Ask a hoax believer what proof would convince them and they will be unable to answer, because everything they ask for has already been provided. They are unable to figure out what it is they want. Makes their entire argument rather pointless! They're just a sad bunch of loosers. |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Sep 28, 2005 Views: 1137 | RE: Stuff Left Behind I agree I wouldn't even waste my time asking them, It's one big conspiracy. Like there would be a lot of point. I've never understood why they want pictures of equipment left behind because they claim all the photo's taken on the moon landing mission are fake, so really they will just claim the pictures of equipment left behind are fakes. You can see it know, pictures of the equipment left behind gets released to the public. They will see the pictures notice a different light source and they'll be running around shouting FAKE STUDIO FAKE FAKE 2 LIGHT SOURCES FAKE STUDIO STUDIO 2 LIGHT SOURCES FAKE FAKE STUDIO!!! Thats what makes me laugh, they say there is two light sources so that means one is the 'Sun' the other a 'Studio Light Bulb'. Surely though If there really is two light sources then one is the 'Sun' and the other is 'Earth' just the same way the 'Moon' acts as a light source to us. The sad thing about HB's is they think they are to smart to be out-witted by NASA. Losers just about sum's them up. |
| Posted By: whiteboy Posted On: Oct 6, 2005 Views: 1110 | RE: Stuff Left Behind First of all, if anybody really left anything behind, isn't that littering? I say pack out more than you came in with. The astronauts were all boyscouts, no boyscouts litter, therefore nothing was left on the moon. Look, how is the US going to fly to the moon if we can't even find some camel jockey in Afgahnistan? think about it... Even if we did really go there...some of the pics and movies were clearly faked...so why do that unless they are all fake?! Hey, if we could go to the moon so long ago, why isn't it a lay up now? Maybe because we never whent there in the first place? Oh...look....I just won a years worth of free gasoline...oh and a lap top....of and an hourly prize!! ....oh look...there is something on the moon, left by people who don't litter.. and oh look, we went to the moon over 40 years ago and can't remember how we did it! Ohhh must be the ozone depletion...yeah..that's it.... |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Oct 6, 2005 Views: 1106 | RE: Stuff Left Behind I never quite understand why just because it's been about 40 years since we have been to the Moon, that this automatically makes it a reason we didn't go to the moon. Afterall it's not that expensive and it's not like there is anything else to research about!!! I'd hardly call leaving a flag and some equipment behind littering, it's not like they left empty beer cans and empty packets of Walkers crisps lying about everywhere. Or maybe the Americans just went to the moon to do some mass 'Fly-Tipping', i don't know. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 7, 2005 Views: 1100 | RE: Stuff Left Behind Grant, why bother? |