| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> Technology | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Technology |
| Posted By: KoRn Posted On: May 18, 2006 Views: 1020 | Technology I'm not sure we had a suitable technology in 1969 to send a man on the MOon and back... :) If yes, why didn't we send a man on Mars 20 or 30 years later? And here is a simple answer ...because we have had no technology for that! Go, read the books :) |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 18, 2006 Views: 1018 | RE: Technology So you're not sure if we had the technology. In that case I suggest you do some research until you are. |
| Posted By: KoRn is LAME Posted On: May 19, 2006 Views: 1015 | RE: Technology We sure did have the technology...Ya know how I know? We went to the moon..that's how I know. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 19, 2006 Views: 1013 | RE: Technology You are so right! |
| Posted By: KoRn Posted On: May 27, 2006 Views: 1001 | RE: Technology yesterday I watched a document (Fox channel) about that. The guys discussed so many issues like waving flag, strange oriented shadows (caused by SEVERAL light sources - should be only Moon, don't you think? :), photo crosshairs BEHIND the objects (what a ****in amateurs :), enormous radiation in such deep space... etc etc.... I recommend to watch this document... Look at videos how the "astronauts" moves... yes, it seems that there is different gravity - play the movie twotimes faster - isn't it now like on the Earth? :) I believe you are so inteligent that you know the gravity is 6 times weaker then the Earth's :) now do you get it?! (NASA is a pack of amateurs :) It was impossible to land on the Moon in 1969 (especially USA). Even today (after 36years!) it is complicated and nobody has such plans. Isn't it strange?! :) |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 27, 2006 Views: 998 | RE: Technology I honestly think you should read my main page on the subject before making any further comments that have been made, and answered, a million times before. It gets so boring. |
| Posted By: KoRn Posted On: May 29, 2006 Views: 989 | RE: Technology You wrote: "The cross hairs on the photographs were produced by a glass plate within the camera, between the lens and film." ..okay, if it is standard design of camera, why all hoax believers always point to that? Are they so stupid? :) Think about that.... :) I've got one personal question for you: How would you feel if you find out your government lied to you? |
| Posted By: KoRn is LAME and QUEER Posted On: May 29, 2006 Views: 984 | RE: Technology Do you want to know why I KNOW your full of complete and utter sh** KoRn? Because your ignorant and you actually think that the people at NASA are less intelligent than you. I just hope your only 6 years old or something, so that you still have a future (maybe). You just keep doing your homework. Goodluck to you. |
| Posted By: KoRn Posted On: May 29, 2006 Views: 981 | RE: Technology Now I'm not sure who's 6 year old kid... I thought you'll give me some regular answers but no... You just call me ignorant and other empty words. You even can't answer what would you do if you find your government lies to you... I think you would go into corner, cry and champs your teeth.Again, what is your answer, kid? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 30, 2006 Views: 979 | RE: RE: Technology KoRn, You said ".....okay, if it is standard design of camera, why all hoax believers always point to that? Are they so stupid?..." Yes, exactly, it is because they are so stupid. Not one of you has ever had an original thought. Try looking up how the camera and film worked, you may learn something. |