| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - MOON LANDINGS -> RE:facts | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: RE:facts |
| Posted By: johnny Posted On: Dec 31, 2006 Views: 1162 | RE:facts ok, keith...seems i got a little carried away there. but then again, it happened to you too, when you attributed me the "qualities" of a daft. i studied your answers very carefully and i agree you might be right. as for those irefutable evidence, i guess you dismissed them all. although the fact that we never again sent men to the moon still raises some questions. i'm neither a believer, neither a skeptic. i'm only trying to get to the bottom of this. just to make you feel better, i don't believe the 9/11 atacks were a conspiracy...so i'm not the type of person who would believe "just about everything",to quote you. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Dec 31, 2006 Views: 1159 | RE: RE:facts That isn't correct, I did not suggest you were daft, this is what I said (under the thread 'facts...'). "YOUR QUESTION TO ME. Regarding your so-called counter-arguments, they are exactly what you say the theorists' arguments are: bad science and ignorance. MY REPLY. Really? Please give examples where my science is wrong and I will admit to being stupid. Don't make wild claims you are unable to back up, it makes you look daft." It was an opportunity for you to make me look stupid IF I had made a scientific error. If however, you could not find any error then, as I said, that would make you look daft for making a false claim. I think that is fair comment and sound advice. As for not going back to the moon making you doubt we went there in the first place, what different/additional proof could be supplied if they did that would convince you? |