| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - THE BIG BANG THEORY -> Big Bang? LOL | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Big Bang? LOL |
| Posted By: Christianity's the only way Posted On: Apr 19, 2011 Views: 1162 | Big Bang? LOL If the Big Bang really happen than explain this! Law of Conservation of Angular Motion: The direction in which an object is spinning will cause anything that "spins off" from it to spin in that same direction. If the Big Bang theory is true than shouldn't everything that spins off of the original "dot" be spinning backwards? Yes Than why are two or three of planets, eight or ninety-one known moons and even whole galaxies spinning backwards? I have an Explanation! God did that on purpose to make the whole theory look stupid! |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Apr 20, 2011 Views: 1160 | RE: Big Bang? LOL The only thing looking stupid here is you. The Big Bang did not start as a spinning object throwing off spinning objects, that's just nonsense. As for planets "spinning backwards" I have no idea what you are talking about. You do not understand the Big Bang, read up on it before making silly remarks. |
| Posted By: tom Posted On: May 27, 2011 Views: 1122 | RE: Big Bang? LOL Religion is so fing stupid, god is an imaginary freind that someone invented a long long time ago to screw with peoples minds..... its all a joke |
| Posted By: AgnosticTheorist Posted On: Oct 20, 2012 Views: 981 | RE: Big Bang? LOL Arguments against the existence of God: Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god? There exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. An omniscient, wholly good being would prevent the occurrence of any intense suffering it could, unless it could not do so without thereby losing some greater good or permitting some evil equally bad or worse. (Therefore) There does not exist an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being. Gratuitous evils exist. The hypothesis of indifference, i.e., that if there are supernatural beings they are indifferent to gratuitous evils, is a better explanation for (1) than theism. Therefore, evidence prefers that no god, as commonly understood by theists, exists. God exists. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good. A perfectly good being would want to prevent all evils. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence. An omnipotent being, who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good being, then no evil exists. Evil exists (logical contradiction). |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 20, 2012 Views: 979 | RE: Big Bang? LOL Love your comments, very well put. I entirely agree. Well done. |
| Posted By: An Interested Observer Posted On: Feb 1, 2017 Views: 715 | RE: Big Bang? LOL On the concept of God's existence, I once brought up a notion that seemed to make the most sense to me that could incorporate a God and the existence of Evil. It would logically be one of the few acceptable concepts that could justify God's existence. Consider that God exists for a moment. And that he is Perfect. Good is a concept that has an opposite. Evil. Evil can be viewed as a flaw of an imperfect species such as Humanity. But then, for evil to exist, there has to be something on the opposite site of the spectrum to classify evil as being evil, now wouldn't it? If there was no Good. Would all things be evil? If there was no evil would there be a concept known as Good? I'd bring forth that both notions are created by the imperfect species thhus implying that both are imperfect concepts. God is perfect, thus he would not be categorised with imperfect notions. What then is the perfect alignment that is in the absence of flaw and bias? Perhaps Neutral. God is neither good, nor is he evil. He just Is. I am not religious. But If I were to go on a little faith, this would be the only God I could logically accept as existing. Why is the Universe there? Because it is. Did God make it? If he exists, then he might have. Does he have a sort of benevolent viewpoint to the world? Why would he? What is so special about Earth? Look up at the sky and with a strong enough scope you'll find a thousand more like it. The ideologies of the world are created by a flawed and imperfect species none of which would come even close to accurately identifying what may be beyond imperfect comprehension.Thus if God exists. He is not the christian god. He may not even be a "he". It is a concept beyond all understanding. I brought that concept up to a Philosophy class of mine. And found no disputes to the notion. |