| THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - IS INFINITY REAL? -> microscope | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: microscope |
| Posted By: just another organism on the mudball Posted On: Dec 7, 2005 Views: 1001 | microscope think about this if you took the most powerful microscope and found the electron clouds in an object and the magnified again with the same microscope power until you got to the actual protons and electrons and then targeted one of them magnified again until you got to the surface and then magnified again like a satellite orbiting our mud ball why couldnt that be true? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jan 27, 2006 Views: 976 | RE: microscope Because when you get down to sizes smaller than a fundemental particle, then what you have is not solid anymore, its just fluctuating energy levels. |
| Posted By: BUCKLO5 Posted On: Feb 2, 2006 Views: 969 | RE: microscope MAYBE BUT HAVE WE EVEN SEEN THAT FAR CAN WE REALLY KNOW WHATS ON A (PROTON) / LITTLE EARTH INSIDE THE (QUANTUM SPACE) OF ANOTHER ORGANIC OBJECT HERE ON EARTH IV'E HEARD AS FAR AS WE CAN SEE IS JUST TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE ELECTRON CLOUDS OF AN OBJECT WE CANT SEE INTO THE QUANTUM WORKINGS JUST KIND OF KNOW THEY ARE THERE RIGHT? AND HOW DO WE KNOW THAT WHAT WE SEE WITH OUR BIG EYES ISNT A DIFERENT REALITY WHEN YOUR'E THAT SMALL ,I MEAN SMALL.MOST ORDINARY PEOPLE CANT COMPREHEND THAT SMALL. MY THEORY GOES BOTH WAYS IF WE WERE BIG ENOUGH TO SEE OUT INTO SPACE AND BEYOND WE WOULD SEE THAT WE ARE (MILKYWAY) AN ELECTRON CLOUD AND THERES PROBABLY PEOPLE TRYING TO SEE OUR ELECTRON CLOUD OF WHO KNOWS MAYBE IF WE LOOK AT HOW MANY PLANETS THERE ARE IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM YOU COULD GO AHEAD AND SAY THOSE ARE THE ENERGY LEVELS OF THE ATOM WE MAKE UP? HHMM? WHATS IT NINE? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 2, 2006 Views: 967 | RE: microscope There is no similarity between an atom and the solar system.That daft comparism was discarded over 100 years ago. Keep up! |
| Posted By: Demigod Posted On: Feb 2, 2006 Views: 965 | RE: microscope yes, it has been discarded.. do you know why? Because they were trying to compare the two theories. Problem is we always try to find answers that we can comprehend at our "size". What I mean by that is, From the edge of our "known universe" down the the smallest atom. Anything larger or smaller than this we will never know what physics are involved and possibly a different periodic table altogether. So, maybe not an atom from a donkey's leg.. but our universe could be part of something which in combination of billions of other universes, forms an atom. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 2, 2006 Views: 962 | RE: microscope I can't really argue against you because your argument cannot be tested, it's just an idea. However, having said that, there is nothing at all to support the idea that we are part of an atom. Take your pick. |
| Posted By: Routt Posted On: Mar 7, 2007 Views: 872 | RE: microscope Man, I hate when people type in all caps. I hate it so much I just don't read what they're saying, no matter what it is. It's the electronic equivalent of saying, "Look at me, I can't put forth the effort to move my left pinky finger the 3/16ths of an inch required to reach the caps lock button. (Sorry guys, I'm a prejudiced American and never learned the metric system.) |