THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS - IS INFINITY REAL? -> EVOLUTIONStart A New Topic | Reply
Post InfoTOPIC: EVOLUTION
Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 11, 2009
Views: 667
EVOLUTION



Posted By: ZX9

Posted On: Apr 12, 2009
Views: 657
RE: EVOLUTION

You idiot! I did NOT say that fossils were ONLY there to test us. I said that their 'patterns' may have been there to test us. I do not claim that the dinosaurs did not exist! I claim the patterns in fossils you say to be an evolutionary chain leading up to us may be flawed.

Radio carbon dating is incorrect, flawed, pathetic, and inaccurate. I don't really care if the guy got the Nobel or not. I care about whether or not it works. I have shown you (and you agreed) that it is inaccurate.

I agree that fossils CAN show us many things about the past, but we disagree as to what they can show. Is it not true that there is missing links in the 'chain', never discovered? It is true indeed. I know some of what Darwin published, for instance dinos->birds. Yes, there are similarities, and there are things close-looking in different families. That doesn't prove anything.


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 13, 2009
Views: 652
RE: RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: ZX9

Posted On: Apr 13, 2009
Views: 647
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 13, 2009
Views: 645
RE: EVOLUTION

So you are now saying that there is not a single genuine fossil of a Neanderthal man in existence - because they did not exist - but dinosaur fossils are okay because they did. So God planted some false fossils but some are genuine and only you know which is which!

Who on earth do you think you are to think you are so much smarter than all the professionals of the last two hundred years who have been examining these fossils? You are just a dumb 11 year old who is absolutely clueless when it comes to the facts of evolution but swallows any old crap the church fills your head with. Have you any idea how much science the church has tried to to say is false over the centuries? Obviously not, have a quick study of the Catholic church and learn something about religious manipulation of the truth.

I give up, you are honestly too bleeding stupid to bother with. I have come across some idiots in my time but you genuinely have to be in the top three.

You seriously need to wise up and stop talking such a load of crap!

BTW that link you asked me to read about fake fossils, I did read it and guess what, it says Neanderthal man was real! You even quote that part!!!!Yet again you recommend a site that goes AGAINST your argument. You just get more stupid with every post you make!


Posted By: Kevin

Posted On: Apr 13, 2009
Views: 638
RE: RE: EVOLUTION

Keith, its impossible. We've both tried to talk to this kid and enlighten him to reality but its just impossible to teach an 11 year old about this stuff when he disagrees with every piece of SOLID evidence we present to him. He tries to point out that all of the prehuman fossils are fake or whatever and uses some foolish site to support his claims. He just doesn't understand that 90% of the crap posted on the internet are based on nothing at all except one person's uneducated opinion. Hopefully he will grow up and learn the truth but until then its hopeless. He acts as though he knows everything becuase he can go onto uncredited websites and read. Do you not understand that Keith has been learning about this stuff for longer than you've been alive and I although only in college have still invested much much much more time in learning and understanding this world than you do. Its just hopeless. You can't have a legitimate debate with a person who contains 1% of the knowledge you do and won't accept any scientifically credible evidence that has been studied for hundreds of years. He believes evidence from a nonsense website by people with no real learning at all in the field is equal to that of the work of thousands of scientists over a time of over one hundred years. No use in talking to him anymore.


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 13, 2009
Views: 634
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: ZX9

Posted On: Apr 14, 2009
Views: 626
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 14, 2009
Views: 620
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 17, 2009
Views: 611
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Wormwood

Posted On: Apr 19, 2009
Views: 602
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Apr 19, 2009
Views: 594
RE: EVOLUTION



Posted By: Mike

Posted On: Apr 24, 2009
Views: 584
RE: EVOLUTION

Just as a preemptive statement, I am a High school student, who is 16, 5 years older then you. Now seriously listen, when i was your age (yes I still remember)I HATED when people patronized me, I HATED it. so I know how you feel (about that, but even when i was ur age, i didnt believ that crap, hell even when i was seven years old in ccd i asked my teacher if there was any 'proof' that god existed and all she could reply with was 'faith') . But once in a while you just have to realize that right now your brain is going through a MASSIVE amount of growth, the frontal lobe of your brain (the area that effects logic, reasoning and conceptual ideas) is being activated. Right now concrete ideas are your only reference. even though you reject all of these facts laid out before you, that does not automatically make the perspectives of hundreds and thousands of educated men completely false. From the information you have seen and gathered at this point in your life, yeah, none of this is "sound" evidence to you. But I ask you this, did you search for a specific answer to your question when were doing research, because if that is the case then you will find the answer you were looking for. try researching both sides of the argument, and see if your mind is changed. Know your what you criticize, even if if you think its all "nonsense". And if you do that, then maybe people on this site will give you some credit, and respect you for being a well informed 11-year old, instead of disrespecting you for being an ignorant person regardless of age.

- Also, if your looking for proof of the age of the earth, look up radio-active isotope dating. it is far and away the most stable and accurate form of molecular dating. keep in mind that the radioactive elements tested cannot be broken down or altered by anything other then their own steady and well known intervals of self decomposition,known as a half life.


-if you go to a good school you'll learn all you need to know about what you are talking about in freshmen bio.



Posted By: Mike

Posted On: Apr 24, 2009
Views: 583
RE: RE: RE: EVOLUTION

oops haha, I didnt realize he was gone,I was trying to talk him down so he didnt continually spam this site w/ uninformed bs

haha


Posted By: Kieren

Posted On: May 16, 2009
Views: 349
RE: EVOLUTION

I am constantly amazed by the ridiculous comments made by people - such as ZX9 - (why name yourself after a mediocre motorcycle?) who refuse to accept evolution. To ignore such compelling evidence, from a number of different disciplines, simply goes to show how it is impossible to teach some people anything, they will remain ignorant for the rest of their unenlightened lives. What a waste!


Pages [ 1 2 ] Next Page ->  

Theories with Problems