| RPG CLASSICS - RPG CLASSICS POLL -> NO! | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: NO! |
| Posted By: Michael Posted On: Feb 10, 2003 Views: 464 | NO! Why am I one of two people that doesn't want to see a series ruined with too many sequels? Only Final Fantasy gets better each game. Chrono Trigger was way better than Chrono Cross. |
| Posted By: Ybrik Metaknight Posted On: Feb 11, 2003 Views: 448 | RE: NO! Just because Chrono Cross wasn't as good as Chrono Trigger (although IMHO it was still a pretty good RPG, just not as good as CT) doesn't mean that further sequels won't be good. |
| Posted By: josh Posted On: Feb 11, 2003 Views: 442 | RE: NO! Chrono Cross was better than Chrono Trigger ever will be! They need to make another sequal that is just as good as Chrono Cross or better! Chrono Cross was ten times better than Trigger. |
| Posted By: The nose Posted On: Feb 12, 2003 Views: 427 | RE: NO! They were both fantastic! Bunch of idiots, another sequel will mean even more days of gaming and the utter destruction of my social life( which was nothing anyways) Praise the NU for a possible sequel |
| Posted By: Unknown Posted On: Feb 13, 2003 Views: 405 | RE: NO! Chrono Cross was not as good as Chrono Trigger. Trigger was awesome, Cross was fun but I wanted more from the game the whole time. |
| Posted By: Snake Eyez Posted On: Oct 21, 2003 Views: 395 | RE: NO! Now hang on a second. Sequels don't ALWAYS suck. Most of the time, but not always. Take Austin Powers, for example: everyone thought Goldmember was going to be bad because the second one was such a disappointment, but it turned out being better than the other two (okay, maybe that wasn't the best example, but you get the idea). What I'm trying to say is that another Chrono game won't necessarily be bad - just keep an open mind about it. |