|Total Comments 208 | Start A New Comment|
|Posted By: Breanna|
Posted On: Dec 14, 2003
|OMG SHE LIKE SO TOTALLY DID IT|
SHE SO DID IT. ITS SO OBVIOUS...
|Posted By: Michelle|
Posted On: Dec 10, 2003
As you may not know, it is stated in several books that Lizzie was disturbed. They all say that she never had any friends and that can drive someone mad. I think Lizzie SO DID IT!!!
|Posted By: Kalishan|
Posted On: Dec 1, 2003
She was nuts!! They heard her laughing upsatairs a few hours before the bodies were dicovered. She was not sad at all to find her father's mutilated corpse. In my opinoin she is guilty. The most obvious event was her burning the dress. She was disturbed and filled with rage. she needed help and medication.There was also no reason for her to be in the barn so long. She sould have been inside taking care of her parents. I dont know how a kid could kill their parents though. You never know, her sister may have been in on it to but the most obvious person is lizzie.
|Posted By: big e|
Posted On: Nov 20, 2003
|lizzie what a sicko|
she did it, in most cases the person who finds the body is the the guilty party. plus why would she lie about where she was when the killings happened. why whould she burn her dress and claim that it had paint on it, thats the worst excuse i ever heard, she chopped off a cats head for no reason other than it belonged to her step mother, clearly she is disturbed, she should have been jailed for that, now a days she would be, well at least she suffered from disease in the end, hope it was painful, that poor little cat.
|Posted By: Katlyn|
Posted On: Nov 14, 2003
|WAS LIZZIE GUILTY|
I think it was Lizzie because she was molested by her father and that would really be something to want to kill him about and then he married another lady.She did have reasons to want to kill him and she probally thought about it alot then finally did it.
|Posted By: Jessica|
Posted On: Nov 10, 2003
Nobody really knows so don't judge aight Maybe she was guilty of murder but why did she do this maybe sexual child abuse or of some sort.
|Posted By: stacey vadney|
Posted On: Oct 30, 2003
I think she got away with it. some how I'am related to her and I'am in the prosses of trying to found out what was going on with her when she did that
|Posted By: Nancy|
Posted On: Oct 28, 2003
HELL NO!!!! She got away with murder.
|Posted By: Bonnie|
Posted On: Oct 28, 2003
I have read alot about the case and I think by the process of elimination it just had to be Lizzie who did it!!!!! It had to be an insider because all of the doors were always locked. She was a very smart woman who was probably psychotic and believed that she hadn't done it.
|Posted By: Dyanne|
Posted On: Oct 25, 2003
Having read over and over all of the material that I can get my hands on .....I still and will always believe that the Uncle was the Killer of the Bordens. Don't you find it very hard to believe that he had no idea what was going on at the house when he was standing right across the street ? Think about that one..............
|Posted By: MAGS|
Posted On: Oct 21, 2003
come on now. there's absolutely no opposing view to the lizzie case. she was molested by her father, was psychologically messed up, and didn't even (probably) know what she was doing, but she whacked 'em.
|Posted By: jade meuse|
Posted On: Oct 19, 2003
she is as guilty as o.j.! she simply had the means ($) to get off!
|Posted By: Mo Woods|
Posted On: Oct 12, 2003
|Lizzie Didn't Do It|
Lizzie is simply the scapegoat. She did not do it!
|Pages [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ]|