Total Comments 15 | Start A New Comment

Post Info

Comment

Posted By: tony Posted On: Sep 24, 2007 Views: 2922	obvious norad would have stopped these planes. a bowing did not crash into the pentagon. the towers fell via a controlled demolition. september 11 was US government controlled to spark fear and anger in the american people. therefor allowing the president to waltz into iraq(after falsifing its connection w/ al-queda) and start allowing more innocent people to die. i strongly believe that these people should have to answer to the horrors they allowed, but fear they never will.
Posted By: Islamabhad Posted On: Nov 1, 2006 Views: 3311	whatever this is all bogus
Posted By: sar Posted On: Oct 10, 2006 Views: 3253	bush william how can you say that, in my opinion bush was informed about it but just didnt think anything would happen to perfect america.... when they did it, perfect!! i can go get daddys oil now. with all the inteligence the us has why hasnt bin laden been found, surley the us goverment should know where he is i mean the goverment did fly the bin laden family out of the usa just a few hours after 9/11 happend. and the bin laden family have shares in bush`s oil company. why the hell did you guys elect him again. and why is the uk going along with it!
Posted By: damo Posted On: Oct 5, 2006 Views: 2102	Who Know's we will never know what happened , but the us gov if they had something to do with it will stuff up some time then it will get interesting , but for now lets just sit back and watch bush try and take over the world , as they say like father like son
Posted By: be rad Posted On: Sep 11, 2006 Views: 1889	what to believe? its easy to say that conspiracy's are all bunk. however, there is much more evidence that things did not go as the major media has told. come on!! show me a plane at the pentagon!!
Posted By: william Posted On: Sep 10, 2006 Views: 1896	conspiracy theory sucks! Whoever thought of these theorys has a warped mind and needs to leave the USA and go live with those terrorist!
Posted By: Mark Posted On: Aug 19, 2006 Views: 1977	Hack This website is a hack. Get a life.
Posted By: zercon2 Posted On: Feb 19, 2006 Views: 2271	9/11 and the Lusitania - lessons from history?? At the outbreak of WW1 in August 1914 the ship RMS Lusitania was handed over to the Admiralty she was then equipped with twelve 6-inch guns. The Germans protested against the arming of merchant ships, pointing out that this would force them in turn to abandon the chivalrous "stop-and search" procedures that had hitherto been a feature of the U-boat war. Up to that time, a submarine would invariably surface, order the vessel to stop, board her, seize papers and anything else of value, and allow the crew ample time to take to the boats, before launching a torpedo. From now on the Germans would have no option but to attack without warning. They also lodged protests about the use of neutral flags by the British, particularly the Stars and Stripes. The German Embassy in New York placed prominent advertisements next to the Lusitania's timetable in the shipping pages, reminding travellers that a state of war existed between England and Germany and that the waters around the British Isles were considered a war zone........ When the Lusitania left New York on the 1st May 1915, Captain Turner was concerned by the threat, but he had been assured by the Admiralty that a British cruiser, the Juno, would be there to meet him, as soon as he entered the danger zone off the southern coast of Ireland. On Wednesday the 5th May, Winston Churchill, and the First Sea Lord, Admiral Fisher held a meeting at the Admiralty, at which they decided to withdraw the Juno from the waters around Queenstown, Southern Ireland. Whatever their motivations were for this act, no-one saw fit to inform Captain Turner, and the Lusitania sailed on obliviously into the danger zone........ The Germans attacked and sunk the Lusiania even though it was flying the "Stars and Stripes." Due to this 'act of piracy' by Germany, resulting in 128 American deaths, the USA into the war on Britain's side. The British Government's attitude to the the wreck can be judged from the fact that for several years afterwards, the Royal Navy used the Lusitania as a target for intensive depth-charging exercises. Many of her secrets were undoubtedly obliterated in the process. The wreck is now unrecognisable as once being the pride of the Cunard fleet. Britain 'allowed' the sinking to occur to bring the USA into the war. Could it be the case that 9/11 was 'allowed' by the USA for a similar reason??
Posted By: zercon Posted On: Feb 19, 2006 Views: 2238	Too much secrecy The USA government have surpressed evidence and failed to answer questions. These theories will continue to grow until they, for example, release video footage from CCTV cameras showing approaching hijacked 9/11 planes. Thus proving they were the planes and not missles, as claimed by some. I believe that senior USA authorites knew about the terrorist plans but chose not to act. They needed another "Pearl Harbor" to unite the country and thus back Bush in his polital aims. That being to invade Iraq and get the oil.
Posted By: AKC Posted On: Jul 16, 2005 Views: 2381	Theory 3 I would have to say that theory three is closest to the "truth", except for the fact that it ignores the US Government's complicity in the "attacks". In a time when anybody who didn't look WASPy enough couldn't get on a plane without being cavity searched for dime bags or whatever, it seems really unlikely that a bunch of obviously nervous Middle Eastern men are going to be able to skate past airport security... unless the security screeners were specifically told to turn a blind eye to them. These "attacks" were done so that Bush's Carlysle Group buddies could get rich off a war (that had been in the planning for years and years) and so that the Christofacists could begin their assault on freedom here at home. There are no terrorists, only stupid, greedy American bastards.
Posted By: cj Posted On: Apr 10, 2004 Views: 2443	Small conspiracy I think scenario 3 was most likely, but don't see a problem with it particularly. I really believe that the US air security was lax and allowed these terrorists to conduct their murderous mission. I beleive flight 93 was shot down to protect Washington. The people on board were going to die anyway and they knew it; rather go down in fields than in a city. I think the US goverment covered up the downing of flight 93 to make heroes of the people on board and to prevent panic. My friend was on a flight to the US a few days after 9/11 and they were guided in by fighter jets - she said she felt safe knowing they were there, but I slapped her into reality by telling her, that if the pilot made any strange moves, they would be have been shot out of the sky....this would unerve anyone, so that is why they kept quiet.
Posted By: tt Posted On: Feb 18, 2004 Views: 2486	affected by bush? Sure MY life wouldnt be affected if Bush goes (I'm not even American), but the lifes of countless Iraqis might have been changed (spared) if he hadn't been there in the first place
Posted By: temporary Posted On: Feb 12, 2004 Views: 2299	i want the truth! i'm not a bush hater. i rallied around and supported him after the attacks. now i have questions. theres a bunch of crazy theroies out there making all kinds of speculations and all i want is the truth. truth#1 - bush was at an elementary school reading to abunch of students, when told about the attacks he gave a look like a deer staring at your headlights and then countinued to read to them for 15 min. ( IT's ON VIDEO) why? it makes him unavaliable. why? not sure, when asked he gave a very lame excuse he didn't want to upset the children and nobody hounded on it. thank you main stream news media for asking the tough questions. im going to speculate here - i'm not absoultly sure, but i think the pres is the only person who has the authority to give orders to shoot down a commercial airliner. make him unavalible and he can't give those orders. maybe you can come up with something better. if so post it. the vp was at the white house and said something like "i was picked up and rushed out by secrect service, my feet didn't even touch the floor" why? i guess the WH has a big target on it. this action makes sense to me. i think the end result of all this was to get support for the war in iraq. what does iraq have? the 2nd largest supply of oil in the world. what i have learned is that nobody does something for nothing. why go through all this to goto war with iraq? not sure, but i'm going to speculate that it's for money. somebody might have lobbied this administration to get this done. if so i hope it was worth all the death, destruction and sleepless nights for the rest of us for who ever made this investment to the bush camp. i guess soon they can afford to buy that bigger penis. p.s. - when binladen is caught 1 week before national elections, i want to lobby for a public execution, death by dismemberment. remember bull**** comes from everywhere, don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see. investigate for yourself
Posted By: anon Posted On: Jan 27, 2004 Views: 1978	this I believe that the truth is being with-held. The public has a right to know. America is an hypocrisy. Oil and power over the rest of the world. Can't find Osama?! Bomb the heck out of Iraq!! We need to think outside of what the media presents us, BECAUSE WE HAVE TOO!!! **Suppressing the truth leads to an upheaval.**
Posted By: yobylf Posted On: Jan 19, 2004 Views: 1886	Quick! Duck. Whew that was close I'm assuming you're having a good laugh at the 9/11 "theories" you wrote. Your knowledge of aviation is obviously limited. The theories you created simply could not have happened. Not even close. I'm shocked that some people actually believe them. That is pretty sad. And to all the Bush haters, if he died tomorrow and your favorite candidate became president, your life wouldn't change a bit. Miserable people need someone to blame for their misery. Lord knows they'll most of them will never do anything about it. I'm hardly a Bush lover, but I do have a problem with angry ignorant people who complain, complain, complain. Pathetic.