| NEW TALENT -> Great dessert chef, here we go.......... | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... |
| Posted By: YotSot Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 644 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... BakaKage, you're a homophobic prick. Go kill yourself. |
| Posted By: Aurora Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 642 | RE: RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... Alright, thats it, Ive had enough of this nonsense. I dont know how you all can be so pathetically idiotic, especially you Baka Let us review your last post shall we.. you believe there could be flying lizards that contain chemicals that ignite when they breathe. AND you believe in god yet, and this is what kills me you have the audacity, the gall, to say fairies and unicorns DONT exist? What the hell are you smoking. Dragons are just gobbledygook but unicorns fairies.. how can you not believe in them.. people are always seeing fairies, they help people.. they live with the leprechauns under the rainbow. And unicorns? Has no one here seen that movie The Last Unicorn If that isnt proof I dont know what is. Unicorns have been documented for centuries. . You dont believe in unicorns.. well now Ive heard everything.. *Aurora does not claim responsibility for any feelings that may have been hurt in this post. If you thought she was being serious . Well then you deserved to have your feelings hurt* |
| Posted By: dragonmaster Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 639 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... i didn't know about the beatle. thanks for the info. |
| Posted By: Dave Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 631 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... No if a dragon came up to me, or I saw one, Or They had real proof, I would beleve it. But when there is no PROOF there is no belief. If a dragon was fling through the air and breathing fire I would not pass it off as a parlour trick, Allthough I admire your choice of words there, But still there are no bones, No hard core facts. Its just too out in left field. Is bigfoot real? |
| Posted By: Dave Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 631 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... I mean baiscally your living in a fantisy world. I mean you might as well come out and say there is a paul bunion and a bigg ass 40 foot tall ox in histry too. There arepeople out htere that base there professions around such truths, when someone other than an aspiring chef and some dude who wishes he was japanise were to have this conversation, well I might take more serious consideration to the concepts. Consider the source |
| Posted By: Sure Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 629 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... Ok, what strikes me DM, is that you not only believe in one type of dragon but many, with no proof for any. Their have been and are many mythological creatures, but very few have been proven, and those themselves were far more rational in the sense of possibility, i.e. giant squids. Also had I seen a dragon would I believe my eyes? Of course not. If you saw an alien would you believe your eyes? There can be many explanations for the phenomenon. Faith may be attributed to Gods, but Gods are said to be infinitely beyond our understanding, unlike dragons, so faith is not the same for both. |
| Posted By: Sure Posted On: Jun 9, 2004 Views: 627 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... One last thing, BakaKage, seriously, get a grip, even your babble isn't making sense for the babble it is. |
| Posted By: dragonmaster Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 620 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... You must have missed a few weeks ago when i talked about aliens, i beleve in them. there are just to many other solarsystems/planets for there not to be. |
| Posted By: dragonmaster Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 619 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... "And the wild beasts of the islands shall cry in their desolate houses and dragons in their pleasant palaces." Isaiah 13, 22 |
| Posted By: chris Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 613 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... I believe in the great possibility of life on another planet, but intelligent life? and life intelligent enough to create the ability to travel hugely vast distances?....I'm not so sure. dragons? seems to me that a fire breathing dragon bucks traditional theories of evolution. surely you would find evidence of 'fire breathing' in other species if it existed in another. also, why no fossils of these creatures? i think they are just mythical creatures borne from real life lizzards and what our science-lacking ancient humans explained what dinasour bones were. |
| Posted By: Sure Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 603 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... There are many metaphors in the bible as well as inconsistencies, so quoting it will not further your argument. |
| Posted By: BakaKage Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 590 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... What version you using DM? my NKJV refers to Hyenas and Jackals...it was all of animals normally in africa (which being the areas these were written in, quite reasonable) Bigfoot i cant say i believe in. Aliens i saw a pretty convincing video from either a satellite or Space shuttle, i cant remember which...but it had something i find hard to believe as a coincidence. Could possibly just be a flying saucer (the German SS made them in WW2, and many of the SS scientists fled to south america after the war to excape the war tribunals) But dragons...im just saying its totally feasible. No bones? well, there are a lot of extinct animals with no bones left around. Animals that were killed off between 500 and 5,000 years ago rarely have bones left. If you open a casket of a person who died 200 years ago chances are their would be nothing but dust. I already made my case for fossilization being unreasonable. As for why no other animals use fire breathing...most likely because it is highly inneficient. The beetles can do it (not flames, but flesh melting heated fluids) because they are small and do not require as much energy to do this. for a beast like a dragon whose food consumption would be enormous its likely that they would end up dying of starvation or competition for food. The Komodo Dragon found its own tactic by having septic saliva which not only decomposes its food while still alive, but will mortally wound any creature it bites that gets away. That seems a lot more energy efficient than creating fluids. and fire doesn't serve much of a purpose for eating either, aside from making the prey you catch nicely smoked. Just needs hickory for that sweet down home style flavor. okay, off subject. Basically their design was as the superior to all animals. But it ended up most likely killing itself off. Oh well, what else is new. Paul bunyan? cmon...there is plenty of feasiblity to dragons. there used to be people who did grow really tall (11 ft) and some races who rarely went above 4 feet. but 40 ft tall would have been a BITCH to give birth too. |
| Posted By: Sure Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 587 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... Ahh...Wow...they get better and better... |
| Posted By: huh? Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 584 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... chemical emision from an organism to aid in the breakdown of matter/flesh for consumption is one thing...fire breathing is something completely different. Ok, lets just say that an animal can indeed "breathe fire". you would have to assume that the fire would be ignited by a gaseous fuel, as oppposed to a liquid because a liquid fuel would be hard to extinguish and would likely kill the organism...so the fuel would almost have to be some sort of gas. chances are, the gas would be methanol because it's a highly flamable, organic gas that is produced by most plant and meat eating animals (cows produce an extrodinary amount of methanol). To generate enough methanol to ignite a fire for a sustained amount of time, a dragon would probably be a plant eater because plants/grass, etc. produce the most amount of gas in the digestive system. they would also need to eat a massive amount of plant matter to produce enough gas. so if they are plant eaters, then the "advantage" of breating fire is totally irrelevant. what purpose does breathing fire serve to a plant eater? "cooking" the plants destroys most or all of the nutritional value of the plant. you see, every biological function has a distinct purpose in every organism, and breathing fire just doesn't seem to serve much purpose to a plant eating animal. Perhaps for self defense, but evolution has given all organisms much more effective (and simple) means of defense. if "fire breathing" was effective, it would be found in other organisms. fire breathing just isn't a trait held by any other organism in this world, so it just doesn't make any sense. And all of this doesn't even touch upon just exactly how the methanol gas would be ignited (some sort of spark would be needed, and the dragon would have to control the fire somehow). All of this is WAY too technical and complicated for a biological organism. Sorry, from a scientific standpoint, Dragons are just, simply, mythical creatures. |
| Posted By: Aurora Posted On: Jun 10, 2004 Views: 581 | RE: Great dessert chef, here we go.......... That is the best post I have seen on here in days. Excellent work huh? |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 4 ] Next Page -> |