| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> How sad is Keith? | Start A New Topic | CLOSED |
| Post Info | TOPIC: How sad is Keith? |
| Posted By: Ben Posted On: Feb 7, 2005 Views: 798 | How sad is Keith? Very |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 7, 2005 Views: 797 | RE: How sad is Keith? What's that? Me sad? I think you must be mixing me up with someone else. I am in fact a very happy person. A sad person would be someone who is so pathetic they set the alarm every morning so they have time to practice rotating a straw before they go to work. Or who spends hours in front of a psi wheel trying to make it move. Or who sits and watches an ice cube melt and exhaust themselves thinking they are making it move. Or who spends hours trying to make a floating toothpick move! Now that is one really sad person! And that doesn't sound like me at all. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: Feb 8, 2005 Views: 786 | RE: How sad is Keith? He's most likely referring to your flawed science. But from a big-head like yours isn't that all we should expect? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 8, 2005 Views: 784 | RE: How sad is Keith? Tell you what Nick, why don't you explain what part of my science is flawed, or are you only capable of making silly remarks? Having just read your other post I think we already know the answer to that one. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 775 | RE: How sad is Keith? What part of your science is flawed? It's not your method, or your goal. It's not the way you do it. It's just "what" you are trying to prove. So you're trying to prove that you can do things that look like TK without TK? What does that accomplish? It accomplishes nothing at all. Your logic(yeah, that's part of the science) is flawed. You use this as a basis for an attack on TK'ers, but let me outline what exactly you are saying. I'll use some other topics to show how stupid it is... I tell you that my car (a Honda Civic) can beat my mom's Saturn and give you a video of the race. You really don't believe me, so just to screw with my head you make a fake video of a Honda Civic beating a Saturn. You show me this video and say, see, you can't prove to me that your Civic can beat a Saturn from your video because I can easily fake it! See how absurdly stupid that is? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 771 | RE: How sad is Keith? What I have done is to show that the two most commonly used TK stunts can easily be done without TK. I then go on to say that because of these stunts many people wrongly believe that they have TK when in fact they don't. I also explain how they can test to see if they really do have TK. My videos are there only to show how easy it is to fake "TK" videos. The fact that you think this is stupid is your problem. There is nothing wrong with my logic, but there is obviously something seriously wrong with yours. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 767 | RE: How sad is Keith? Paragraphs one and two are basically what I've already said, thanks for the recap. Paragraph three is basically a personal attack, to try and avoid the issue posted in my previous post. You asked me what part of your science is flawed and I said that purposefully faking examples does not scientifically do anything. I have just shown what was wrong with your "science." |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 765 | RE: How sad is Keith? The fact that I have been able to duplicate these two popular TK stunts does not of course prove that TK does not exist. Even if I were able to duplicate every single claimed TK stunt it still would not prove that TK does not exist. It would only prove that all TK stunts can be done without TK, which is not the same thing as saying there is no TK. However, it would make claims for TK look very silly indeed if they were all done by non-TKers! That was from your main site. As you can see, this paragraph is building towards a very illogical point. This is one example of your flawed logic. Just because you can duplicate those things by faking them, doesn't mean that the claimants are faking them too(albeit unintentionally). You examples do not prove that they are all done by non-TKers. It's illogical to a fault, which is why I think you even more of a moron for attacking my logic? Who's the one to speak? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 759 | RE: How sad is Keith? I think practising TK must be very damaging to the brain judging by your comments and other TKers. Just run along now and go play with your psi wheel, I can't be bothered with you anymore. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: Feb 9, 2005 Views: 757 | RE: How sad is Keith? Haha, what a cop out....I think Placebo was right all along. You just some old fogey sitting at home trying to think of reasons why your life doesn't suck so bad, but you can't think of any except you get to pick on TKers on this forum....hahaha |