| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> Why teh argument. | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Why teh argument. |
| Posted By: Bluetears Posted On: May 6, 2005 Views: 863 | Why teh argument. Hmm, I can understand why you, Keith, would want to argue that TK is not real. I personally know my own reasons for argueing against the things that I very much believe are not true, real, etc. But what are your reasons? Tk is not religous, it is not harming to anyone, it in no way disrupts anyones life. If you don't believe its real fine, but why argue it? Do you think that other people are not capable of looking at all facts presented and making up our own minds? Also, its funny how the only topics that are ussually closed are the ones making you look stupid. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 7, 2005 Views: 855 | RE: Why teh argument. None of the topics have managed to make me look stupid. I closed them because the comments were pointless and stupid. Why do I argue against TK? Why shouldn't I? It's a free country. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: May 8, 2005 Views: 846 | RE: Why teh argument. Coming from a person who I proved to have shown to be wrong in the face of his arguing otherwise. ;) |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 8, 2005 Views: 843 | RE: Why teh argument. No Nick. You just showed how dumb you are when it comes to either understanding or presenting an argument. |
| Posted By: Bluetears Posted On: May 9, 2005 Views: 840 | RE: Why teh argument. No, I agree with Nick. The topics you closed were ones that had pointless comments? I think you believe they are pointless because they don't agree with you. And you are dodging my question. See I really believe that if you are going to do anything, especially believe in something, you should know why. Even if you are going to disbelieve in something, it still important to know why. I choose to agrue certain things, and I can give reasons as to why I choose such in ever single case. If you have no reasons, you either need to find some or you are just here to feel better about your self by trying to find people that agree with you on at least one thing. Or so is my theory. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: May 9, 2005 Views: 837 | RE: Why teh argument. >No Nick. >You just showed how dumb you are when it comes >to either understanding or presenting an >argument. Nah, I am only dumb-looking to you Keith, because I was reflecting in my posts the hilarious, and quite pointless nature of yourself. I actually had quite a good argument, which actually culminated in the final changing of your main page, which you said was perfectly logical. You so stood by that (my main page is so logical), that you dared me to point out something illogical in it. When I did, you continued to argue that it was perfectly logical until you obviously couldn't expell any more hot air from your head and gave in to reason. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 9, 2005 Views: 830 | RE: Why teh argument. Nick stop being an idiot all your life, I only changed a few words in line of a sentence to try and make it easier to be understood by imbeciles such as yourself who have such an incredibly low level of comprehension. It seems I failed to dumb it down enough. Go spin a psi wheel and amuse yourself for a few hours. Bluetears. I do not need a reason to disbelieve a thing, I need a reason as to why I should believe it, otherwise I would be compelled to believe in everything, including faires at the bottom of the garden and father Christmas. There is no reason to believe in Tk, it has never, repeat never, been demonstrated under test conditions. So why don't you just go out and demonstrate it? Or is it because like all tkers all you can manage to do is to talk about it? I think we all know the answer to that one. |
| Posted By: Nick Posted On: May 9, 2005 Views: 826 | RE: Why teh argument. >Nick stop being an idiot all your life, I only >changed a few words in line of a sentence to >try and make it easier to be understood by >imbeciles such as yourself who have such an >incredibly low level of comprehension. It seems >I failed to dumb it down enough. Actually, in the real world, this is what happened: 1. Keith says that his videos show that TK isn't what moves the psi-wheel. 2. I tell him that he can't say that because of the videos he made, because it would be illogical. 3. He says that he has no illogical things on his main page and dared me to point it out. 4. I did, and he changed it. It used to say: 1. The two main stunts aren't TK. changed to: 1. The two main stunts can be done without TK. A very, very big difference indeed. Unlike what he said, he didn't just change a few words, he reconstructed the entire sentence. It means something completely different now, don't you agree? |
| Posted By: bluetears Posted On: May 10, 2005 Views: 815 | RE: Why teh argument. Yea, I would agree. Anyway, my point was that you should have a reason for everything. I have reasons why I disbelieve in God, and I have reasons why I do believe in Tk. I understand that you find no valid reason as to why you should believe in Tk. But if you put logic to that, it is exactly the reason why you don't believe in it, the lack of proof to your standards. Thats a common sense application, and all the answer I was looking for. |