RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> check itStart A New Topic | Reply
Post InfoTOPIC: check it
Posted By: Exactly

Posted On: Oct 15, 2005
Views: 863
check it

>1) The two main TK stunts, the
>most popular 'proof' of
>TK, are not TK.
That doesnt explain other things such as covered pendulums and metal bending.

>2) I have never
>seen TK demonstrated.
Thats your problem

>3) TK has never been
>performed under test
> conditions.
oh yeah? see no.5

>4) Nobody has claimed the
>Randi prize money.
Randi doesnt want to lose his money and wont admit he lost if he did.

>5) No respected scientist
>in the world has ever
>claimed that TK exists.
of course not, it would destroy their credibility even if it was true.

>6) No scientific institute
>of any repute has ever
> claimed that TK exists.
oh yeah? see no.5

>7) No respected scientific
>journal has ever reported
>claims that TK exists.
no.5 again

>8) I can think of no
>reason for believing in TK.
your own problem


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Oct 15, 2005
Views: 856
RE: check it

So you agree with me:

1) The two main TK stunts are not TK. I don't make any claim regarding other so called TK stunts. I do though show the exact same effect in my videos of many of the most popular.

2) I have never seen TK performed so that's my problem. Okay, doesn't alter the fact though.

3) TK has never been performed under test conditions. Agreed. See 4)

4) Nobody has ever claimed the Randi prize money. How would he be able to keep it a secret? Having done it once they would be able to do it again elswhere. Shows what nonsense that argument is!

5) No respected scientist in the world has ever claimed TK exists. To argue that they would deny it just to protect their credibility shows your total ignorance. By demonstrating it they would become world famous, the first scientist to ever prove it existed! It's every scientists dream to be the first to prove something!

6) No scientific institute of any repute has ever claimed that TK exists.
This is true. Same applies as in 5). They would just die to get a world exclusive scoop on it! How dumb are you? Do you know nothing about the realities of the world we live in?

7) No respected scientific journal has ever reported claims that TK exists. Same argument as above. They would if they could!

8) I can think of no reason for believing in TK. True, for all the above reasons.

I fail to see how any of the truly daft points you raise advances the cause of TK one jot. Just the reverse as it happens.
You live in a fantasy land. You see conspiracies around every corner, Wise up.
Get real.




Posted By: Exactly

Posted On: Oct 15, 2005
Views: 854
RE: check it

>4) Nobody has ever claimed
>the Randi prize money. How
>would he be able to keep it
>a secret? Having done it once
>they would be able to do it
>again elswhere. Shows what
>nonsense that argument is!

what i meant was he denys people who pass the test their money.


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Oct 16, 2005
Views: 850
RE: check it

Do you honestly think that people have passed the test and Randi has denied them the money?
How?
How could he possibly get away with that?
Anyone that was good enough to pass the test would have no bother in doing it again in front of anothe panel and thereby prove not only that TK exists but that Randi is a cheat and a lier.
I'm afraid your argument is a very silly one and shows that you have not really thought seriously about any of the points you raise.
As your arguments are very childish and naive I guess you are young.
You will learn.


Posted By: Random1

Posted On: Oct 16, 2005
Views: 842
RE: check it

The topics seem to be getting more and more rediculous.

Exactly, you have basically screwed yourself with your own post.

>5) No respected scientist
>in the world has ever
>claimed that TK exists.
of course not, it would destroy their credibility even if it was true.

>6) No scientific institute
>of any repute has ever
> claimed that TK exists.
oh yeah? see no.5

>7) No respected scientific
>journal has ever reported
>claims that TK exists.
no.5 again


You make no attempt to even logically argue your position on the matter (perhaps age is a factor??), and you make others who believe in TK look a little more foolish with every post like this. More and more I see people trying to defend why someone with TK WOULDN'T prove it (James Randi would deny them money, scientists would want to run all kinds of tests on them, it would somehow weaken the TK to use it in a manner other than its "natural" state (all by yourself in your room).

Is there ANYONE who can intelligently defend their position, without resorting to childish fighting and multiple boardnames?


:-|


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Oct 16, 2005
Views: 840
RE: check it

Random1,
I have yet to see any post from any supporter of TK that makes a sensible defense of why it has never been demonstrated.
Every point they make is truly pathetic.


Posted By: Grant

Posted On: Oct 16, 2005
Views: 832
RE: check it

The problem is there is no convincing proof to support TK and the very little they do have has no credibility. On the other hand there are the people who are so convinced they can perform TK or believe in TK that they will argue allday and not take in one word that we put across. There is only one word for this 'Ignorance'.

They say it's all about clearing your mind so that you can perform TK but I really believe that they are doing the opposite by ignoring evidence against TK. They say "check this video out, How did they do that then? prove that is not done by TK". So we all look at this video and its just a joke, an embarressment to anyone that supports TK.


Posted By: Exactly

Posted On: Oct 18, 2005
Views: 814
RE: check it

>Do you honestly think
>that people have passed
>the test and Randi has
>denied them the money?
>How?
How could he possibly
>get away with that?
courts dont favor the paranormal


Posted By: Keith Mayes

Posted On: Oct 18, 2005
Views: 804
RE: check it

I see.
And no newspaper, TV station, magazine, radio station, is prepared to tell the story of how someone was cheated out of $1,000,000?

Please stop being so silly.


 

Return to Telekinesis page