| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> psychic fuctionig | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: psychic fuctionig |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 20, 2007 Views: 806 | psychic fuctionig physicist russel targ was funded by the us government to study how the brain behaves psychiclly and started research on remote viewing,and like i said the results of them and many other parapyscologist show there is a reality to this . |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 21, 2007 Views: 801 | RE: psychic fuctionig There is no connection between remote viewing and telekinesis, so what is the point in discussing it? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 21, 2007 Views: 795 | RE: psychic fuctionig um ....no connection wudnt telekinesis and remote viewing both be psychic functioning |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 22, 2007 Views: 788 | RE: psychic fuctionig So by your reasoning does that mean if remote viewing is real then ALL 'psychic functioning' is real? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 779 | RE: RE: psychic fuctionig no but it points in the direction that the game is far different then we think and things we percieve to be impossible are not.when did i ever say that so remote viewing is real so telekinesis must be.i said which uve must of misread there is evidence thats show esp is in existance to some degree giving more validity to the possiblity of telekinesis |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 777 | RE: psychic fuctionig Let's get one thing absolutely clear right now before we proceed any further. ESP has never been demonstrated by any university or institution in the world, not ever. Claims that that appear to show an ESP effect, either on random numbers or whatever, are all based on nothing more than statistical probability. So instead have having a real effect that cannot be challenged we have only statistical probabilities and comparisons dreamed up by mathematicians and staticians and argued over by other mathematicians and staticians. Proof? I think not. If we had proof, then ESP would be a known scientific fact. It isn't, so ask yourself why? Not too hard to figure is it? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 775 | RE: psychic fuctionig wut???? its been demonstrated at stanford research institute and the institute of noetic sciences theres 2 and i know theres more plus lot of phd carrying parapsycologest |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 774 | RE: RE: psychic fuctionig there is no argument that remote viewing is not a real phenomenon it has clearly been demonstrated at a statisical level way above chance .do your home work |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 768 | RE: psychic fuctionig Yeah, whatever. |
| Posted By: scott Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 745 | RE: psychic fuctionig Cj, Sorry to reach you threw this fourm and it is extreamly of topic would you be interested in emailing me and sharing msn details for OOBE experaments. Im lookinf gor someone to do some tests with me over the internet on remote viewing i require somone to write down 5 numbers and put it in a box or somthing and i will astral project to you and read the numbers. though i need a persion who can do this with me over the internet maybe you will do becuase you may also whant to try this method to valadate your skils. if u are interested email me at scottlindh@bigpond.com (all spam will be reported) once again sorry for the off topic post and im posting this here because i know you are online atm and this is probly the best spot for it. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 743 | RE: psychic fuctionig Okay Scott, I have written 5 numbers down, really. let me know your guesses when you are ready. I will not lie to you. |