| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> psi | Start A New Topic | CLOSED |
| Post Info | TOPIC: psi |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 1331 | psi wow but we have demonstrated telepethy and remote viewing so how bout that keith so obviosly there something to the phenomenon of esp how bout the fact that people are bending the bowls of there spoons keith a physical impossiblility ===================================================== FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH: Telepathy has never been demonstrated, except as a silly stage trick with the help of an accomplice. Remote viewing is another silly con game trick same as telepathy and has never been proven. The only spoon bender I know is Yuri Geller and it has been proven many times over he is a fake. If true, any one of them could easily claim Randi's $1,000,000 Stop making silly claims. ===================================================== |
| Posted By: Deserted Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 1330 | RE: psi I want you to think of a card, not your favorite card, and not obvious cards like aces or anything, imagine the suit of the card burning in your mind, then lower on the left of the card you can imagine the number. Then in the middle of the card u can see the symbols blasting it in the picture, burning it in the card boom boom boom. There's your ESP right there. |
| Posted By: 3ofhearts Posted On: May 23, 2007 Views: 1329 | RE: RE: psi 123456789 |
| Posted By: psionic Posted On: May 24, 2007 Views: 1324 | your mom Posted By: Deserted Posted On: 10 hr, 15 min. ago Views: 6 RE: psi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- I want you to think of a card, not your favorite card, and not obvious cards like aces or anything, imagine the suit of the card burning in your mind, then lower on the left of the card you can imagine the number. Then in the middle of the card u can see the symbols blasting it in the picture, burning it in the card boom boom boom. There's your ESP right there. What? I dont see what your trying to say... |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 24, 2007 Views: 1309 | RE: psi keith ur clearly not talking from research ur talking in opinion ur an moron remote viewing is a form of mental telepathy and the institute of noetic sciences would rele disagree with u u dont know wat ur talking about |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 24, 2007 Views: 1300 | RE: psi cj, Please stop talking nonsense! You talk of "Noetic Sciences" as if it were a reputable scientific institution, which it clearly isn't. Below is a copy of their own statement as to what they are about. "At the Institute of Noetic Sciences, we employ the rigor of science, balanced by personal and collective wisdom, to support a shift in consciousness that transforms present global conditions into a world grounded in freedom, wisdom, and love. We serve an emerging movement of globally conscious citizens dedicated to manifesting our highest capacities." In other words its a bunch of very biased people TRYING TO PROVE that the paranormal exists. That is NOT how scientific research is done. YOU SHOULD BE MUCH MORE SELECTIVE IN WHAT YOU GIVE AS SUPPORT THAT PARANORMAL EVENTS ARE SUPPORTED BY SCIENTISTS. IT ISN'T, GET THAT FACT FIRMLY INTO YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1295 | RE: psi u r so small minded and just deny the facts REMOTE VIEWING WORKS MOR THEN HALF THE TIME WAY ABOVE CHANCE SCIENCE DOEST HAVE A EXPLANTAION YET THAT IS THE SKEPTICS ONLY ARGUMENT AND QUANTUM SCIENCE SUPPORTS REMOTE VIEWING .QUANTUM PHYSICIST ARE GENUISES AND VERY CREDIBLE THEY SUPPORT IT AND R BRINGING IT INTO SCIENCE |
| Posted By: Deserted Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1290 | RE: psi I don't get it, don't u think with logic at all? How do you suppose someone could just think of a place and know what is going on in there? Are you so simple minded? If someone persuades you into believing something like this, sceptics aren't the fools. And kinda think of it, sceptics have never been fools in history. Just accept ur wrong. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 26, 2007 Views: 1279 | RE: psi i was a skeptic of psychics .make a long story short i already was in meditation i happend to stumble on a documentary on esp and they brang up russel targ and his funding and was a little more open but still in doubt because im a magician and know how easy it is to convince someone u have paranormal powers and continued to follow up on it do my home work and watch paranormal debunking shows and listen to their explanations and i found they could acount for a small perecntage of what was goin on but i always found there were hits that could not be explained by normals means.there is no way they could have known that so after some convincing i bought some cheap tapes and books to learn the process ans i was still doubtfull but within week i had a vision that came true that and still wasnt convinced i kept tellin my self coincedence.and i t took me alot of targets hundreds to prove to my self it was real and being done others means |
| Posted By: Deserted Posted On: May 30, 2007 Views: 1266 | RE: psi No. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 31, 2007 Views: 1263 | RE: psi cj, Allow me to give an example of how daft your argument is. I could make 100 'predictions' about significant world events that will happen next month, they would typically include plane crashes, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, major war casualties, fires, floods, famine, etc. etc. None of which come true except for one lucky guess, a plane crashes. You then come along and say 'well he was wrong about 99% of the pedictions, but how do you explain that 1% that was correct?' That is pretty much how daft your argument is. The pity of it is that you are not smart enough to realise it. |
| Posted By: minigan Posted On: Jun 2, 2007 Views: 1259 | RE: psi Well said Keith, couldn't have put it better myself. LOL! Seems to have shut him up as well. Briliant! |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 1256 | RE: psi k remote viewing statiscally defys chance what are you talking about |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 1255 | RE: psi very smart keith umm thats why 1 of 5 is considered chance .explain why remote viewers have a success of 4/5 3/5 over and over again in testing |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 1252 | RE: psi And where so you get the stats for that then? Show me, because that's all you have, stats. I will study the stats if you show me where you get them. |
| Pages [ 1 2 ] Next Page -> |