| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> psi | Start A New Topic | CLOSED |
| Post Info | TOPIC: psi |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 24, 2007 Views: 853 | psi since scientist acknowledge esp as a reality and in existence to some degree .as i see it james randis just gonna sit back in denial while esp slowly becomes science .as a matter of fact remote viewing works more then half the time which clearly is above chance ,its a fact we have no explanation for it but it has been demonstrated .so **** ur self |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 24, 2007 Views: 849 | RE: psi im sorry keith but ur clearly wrong and talkin thru opinion .because the fact is remote viewing is real cant explain it ,has been succesfully repeated in labratorys with a statistical level far surpasing chance.dont let the computer lingo fool you i do my homework .i dont deny the facts and talk out of my ass and try to make the other side look dumb like a high school kid in debate club ================================================ FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH Computer lingo??????????? That is a very poor excuse for not being able to spell or string a few words together in a coherent fashion. You can't spell, you can't make a sentence and you have no idea about grammar or punctuation. You are on the edge of being completely unintelligible. Computer lingo my ass! ====================================================== |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 831 | RE: psi been there and it doesnt give explanation to how remote viewing works more then half the time and clearly defys natural law of chance the only reason the skeptics even have a argument is because theres no definitive explanation on the phenomenon but quantum science and places like the institute of noetic sciences are bringing into science |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 822 | RE: psi cj, Your level of intelligence is causing me concern. The site very clearly explains how the tests were faulty and the results produced meaningless. Read it again, more carefully this time if you manage that? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 816 | RE: psi i read it but it doest acoount for anything but 1 study and that it doesnt account for even 1 percent if that of the phenomenon. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 815 | RE: psi like i said keith ur are the fool and your proving it yourself your just denying the facts and trying to prove somthing faulty that science already believes is possible .and presenting nothing but opinions on 1 study and during the study the remote viewing still presented things that could not be acounted for |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 812 | RE: psi cj, I give up. You quote sources that have no scientific value whatsoever and think that the garbage they produce is scientific. It is a waste of time talking to you so I am not going to bother anymore. You need to learn to be much more discriminating in what you accept, otherwise you may as well read comic books for your source of information. "Look, I have proof that people can fly and have xray vision, I read it in a comic". That is about the level you are on right now. Goodbye. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 26, 2007 Views: 803 | RE: RE: psi i mean i presented my facts uve present ur opinions lol keith there more then 1 institution studying esp. |
| Posted By: minigan Posted On: Jun 2, 2007 Views: 784 | RE: psi cj What you refer to as 'facts' that you have presented are not facts at all. If they were we would not be having this debate, TK and remote viewing would be accepted facts. They are not accepted facts. What does that tell you? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 778 | RE: psi genuis remote viewing has statistical success that cleary goes beyond chance showing psychic functioning and has been replicated in a lab.of course its not scientific fact because its beyond current science and we dont under stand it .that doesnt discount its statisical success and quantum science supports remote viewing .i see no point in argument over somthing that clearly xist and ne one to disagree is talking from opinion and not listening to the facts that cannot be explained away |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 774 | RE: psi 1)Genius remote viewing? What's that? For MENSA members only? 2)Its a statistical success but its not a scientific fact? Its either a success and a fact or it isn't, it can't be both! 3)Quantum science supports remote viewing? Show me the proof of that nonsense. 4)If it clearly exists how come it isn't accepted as a fact and never has been? Why can't you see you are talking nonsense? All you are going by is some stats. Stats can me made to show anything. Show me where you got the stats and I will show you what is wrong with them. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 772 | RE: psi explain how remote viewing works more then half the time defys chance and how we obtain information that we could have never known there are countless studys of this all showing similar results that show remote viewing exist even though we dont understand how it works .how do u not get that .think we got everything figured out |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 771 | RE: psi i was sarcasticlly calling him a genuis dummy |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 765 | RE: psi You still haven't shown where you get these amazing stats from! |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 4, 2007 Views: 599 | RE: RE: psi I have closed this thread because it is pointless going back and forth to 3 different threads all called psi and all repeating the same things from the same poster. I have left the latest one open so you can continue posting there. |