| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> psi | Start A New Topic | CLOSED |
| Post Info | TOPIC: psi |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1476 | psi i have the facts clearly u dont u didnt even no about the government funding so clearly u going to randi .org and reading his poorly thought out opinions that are very false it has been demonstrated do your homework like i did the institue of noetioc sciences has done remote viewing and telepathic experiments very successfully way above chance and like i said its a fact remote viewing works more then half the time and alot of scientist belive the mind has untapped abilitys so u dont now what ur talkin about ====================================================== FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH As I said before, please take note, the Institute of Noetioc Sciences is only concerned IN PROVING that paranormal events are real. It has nothing at all scientific about it, you may as well get your information from a comic book. Stop wasting your time with useless refrences. ====================================================== |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1475 | RE: RE: psi william tiller phd,former professer of materials science at stanford university,daryl bem phd, professor of psychology cornell university,kyriacos markides phd,professor of sociology university of maine,fred alan wolf phd,physicist hmmmmm they all support remote viewing thers more kieth ===================================================== FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH A FORMER prof, a psychologist, a sociologist... Go away. If any paranormal events were real they would have long ago been proved to be, by reputable scientists, and it would be taught in schools in your science lessons. They would no longer be paranormal but normal. Ask yourself why this hasn't happened. Is this too hard for you to work out? ====================================================== |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1460 | RE: psi cj, If you open any more threads I will close them, it just makes it difficult to keep track. |
| Posted By: CJ Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1457 | RE: psi U R SO STUPID WE HAVE NO EXPLANATION SO HOW COULD WE PROVE IT BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT WHEN IT IS CURRENTLY BEYOND OUR UNDERSTANDING DONT POST HERE NE MORE UR A SORRY PERSON .THE FACT IS REMOTE VIEWING IS REAL THATS THE FACT AND CANNOT BE EXPLAINED .EVERYTIME U TRY TO MAKE ME LOOK DUMB UR MAKE URSELF LOOK RETARDED .YOU HEAR ONLY WHAT U WANT AND DENY THE FACTS THAT CONTRADICT U POORLY THOUGHT OPINION ON ESP .U HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT BE A IGNORANT FOOL THE PEOPLE AT THE INSTITTUTE OF NOETIC SCINCES ARE VERY SMART CREDIBLE PEOPLE WITH PHDS ARE HUNDRED TIMES SMARTER THEN YOULL EVER BE SO ILL TAKE THERE ANALYSIS OVER YOUR POORLY THOUGHT ONE ANY DAY |
| Posted By: CJ Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1456 | RE: RE: psi and what makes u think it would have been proven a long time ago we are now just getting esp in science .a hundred years ago the thought of a airplane was considered impossible and paranormal .thats the future for the paranormal keith it becomes the normal your the one wasting your time trying to debunk remote viewing because theres no question that it exist .u didnt even know what remote viewing was until i brang it up and pretty much shut up every skeptic here presenting fact that cannot be explained away remember the only argument a skeptic has is theres no definitive scientific explanation on the phenomenon.that doest discount its statisical success and reality ================================================== FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH Reality? You really should try it some time. I didn't even know about remote viewing until you told me? Get a grip, I knew about it long before you were even born. Stop making foolish remarks, you just make yourself look a right jerk. =================================================== |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1455 | RE: psi these peoples method are scientific and i know for a fact they cant tell results do to chance then by other means and theres no contradicting remote viewings reality .there scientificly showing paranormal effects exist and are repeatable . so theres no contradicting keith dont debate me with opinions and no debunking facts dont post me any more u lose ================================================ FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH Well that's amazing! Remote viewing is now an established scientific fact according to cj. Excuse me I have to go now, I need to find the scientific journal that has published this wonderful new scientific information. Where to start? Hmmm. Think I may try the Superman comics first. I may be gone some time....... ================================================= |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1454 | RE: RE: psi these peoples method are scientific and i know for a fact they can tell results do to chance then by other means and theres no contradicting remote viewings reality .there scientificly showing paranormal effects exist and are repeatable . so theres no contradicting keith dont debate me with opinions and no debunking facts dont post me any more u lose |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1451 | RE: psi keith do you run this site ============================================ FOOTNOTE FROM KEITH I think that just about sums up how dumb you are and how little you know. Who else could edit your comments but the site owner? Whose name is on the title page, on the book cover and on the email address. You are so dumb, no wonder you believe remote viewing is real! You need to learn how to research a subject before making a fool of yourself again. ============================================== |
| Posted By: Deserted Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1444 | RE: psi Dude, what are u doing? |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1439 | RE: psi i messed up and didnt think the first one worked |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: May 25, 2007 Views: 1434 | RE: psi cj, If you want to believe in TK, remote viewing and whatever, fine, that is your choice, but do not tell me that any of your sources are credible because they are not, unless you happen to be very dumb of course. You believe in these daft things because you want to. You just don't seem to understand one very basic thing here, and it is this. If just one credible source was able to prove TK or remote viewing to be a fact, then that test would be repeated by other scientists around the world. By this means it would become a fact and would be accepted (you can't deny a fact) and would no longer be paranormal, but normal. As this has not happened you have to ask yourself why. If your so called scientists had 'proven' remote viewing then it would be a proven fact and accepted as a proven fact. However it exists only in fantasy land and one or two institutions that have no scientific standing and exist only to prove that these things exist. Stop calling me stupid, I am the one talking facts here. I take it by your way of argument that you are just a kid, so why don't you stop wasting your time. I am not going to waste anymore of my time on you. Think what you like you are way too stupid to know the difference between facts and fairy tales. Goodbye. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 26, 2007 Views: 1422 | RE: psi well thats fine keith because ill take a scientist word over a 2 bit magician any day .remote viewing is real face the fact your wrong i win |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: May 26, 2007 Views: 1421 | RE: psi keith well thats shows how stupid you really are and how u dont research and talk from opinion if u new about remote viewing then you wouldve known of the funding ive litterally handed your your ass in this debate you present nothing but twisting words around to try to make your self sound as if you were still right.remote viewings real it works statisically more then half the time/alot of very credible scientist, professors who all support remote viewing /the us goverment concluded in there testing it is a real phenomenon and more hits then misses occur/remote viewing has been performed under scientific conditions/quantum physics supports remote viewing there u go .your wrong |
| Posted By: minigan Posted On: Jun 2, 2007 Views: 1387 | RE: psi cj Keith is right in what he says. If all those institutes and scientists you mention really had proven TK or remote viewing then how do you explain that its not scientifically accepted and only discussed in forums like this? That is your answer right there, TK and remote viewing have never been proven, despite what you say. You need to be more selective in your sources, and I think someone else has already told you that. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Jun 3, 2007 Views: 1383 | RE: psi these people have phds they are a hundred times smarter then all of u they are scientific in there method s they are not just trying to prove the paranormal they are demonstrating results that go beyond chance thats the fact and like i said we have no explanation for the phenomenon but that doest discount its statistical success .it is beyond our understanding we dont understand it .hello so of course there are guna be some scientist who wont believe untill we understand it fully .your guys are unbelieveable you dont present any facts and you still think your right even after i present fact that cannot be explained away and that show you dont research and talk from opinion your wrong |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 ] Next Page -> |