RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> small scale remote viewing experiment | Start A New Topic | CLOSED |
Post Info | TOPIC: small scale remote viewing experiment |
Posted By: cj Posted On: Nov 24, 2007 Views: 774 | small scale remote viewing experiment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TYW95Y67V0,read info heres a second not conclusive but enough there to make you wonder ,think about it the possibilty of this occuring of the basis of chance or statical probabilty is not likly but ill leave it up to you to decide coincedence or possibly rv http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdeGwAC6hdI EDITOR COMMENT: cj, stop making multiple posts when one will do. Its not necessary to make a different post for every little remark. This post did not require 3 separate posts as you can see now that I have put them on one post. You just clutter up the board for no reason. KEITH |
Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Nov 25, 2007 Views: 761 | RE: small scale remote viewing experiment Oh dear, this is so pathetic. The first link is a joke. The book he used is most likely a book about war and the air force, so no surprises he picked up on a war theme! The second one is equally daft. He selects a page from a magazine which happens to have a double page fold out showing a model posing. He fails to mention the model at all but says he scores a hit by picking up smoke on the other page, when it is in fact a tiny picture of a cloud! cj. It really is time you grew up and started thinking logically about what you are seeing instead of being so desperate for it to be true you accept total nonsense as though it were proof. You will never get any respect as long as you continue to carry on in such a juvenile way. |
Posted By: cj Posted On: Nov 25, 2007 Views: 757 | RE: small scale remote viewing experiment read the info that is so not true and hey there 2 pages wat about the water wat about the color yellow being significant clouds maybe?and the other book was not about war and i had no knowledge before hand i swear and ur missing my whole point because your head is so stuffed up no disrespect but the purpose is to show there is a statiscally signifcant effect not definitive but enough to warrent further investigation |
Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Nov 26, 2007 Views: 744 | RE: small scale remote viewing experiment You just don't get it do you? We could not see what he was writing or what was written when he pointed to the page. For all we know he could have mentioned every primary colour plus loads of other stuff that he would then claim were 'hits', like steam being a cloud. Its a joke that there was a double page pull out of a model, by far and away the most obvious thing, and it wasn't even mentioned! On your basis I could get a hit every time with the following: red, yellow, blue, green, earth, rocks, water, clouds, people, engine, building, religion, war, love, space, ship, car. Using your very loose way of connection those words would be enough to score a hit with any picture. Anyway, a video is totally worthless as we all know. When are you going to be realistic and try to be reasonable instead of accepting every daft thing you see? Try using your brain for a change because you are so annoyingly dumb when it comes to common sense and logic. |
Posted By: cj Posted On: Nov 27, 2007 Views: 734 | RE: small scale remote viewing experiment oh please its nothing like that! and if it was the case which its not i most certianly wouldnt be supporting its reality |
Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Dec 6, 2007 Views: 719 | RE: small scale remote viewing experiment This thread is now closed as cj has finally admitted in the thread "reality v the paranormal" that there is no evidence for remote viewing. |