| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> evidence | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: evidence |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Dec 6, 2007 Views: 877 | evidence wow keith there is evidence for **** sake (PRINCETON) UNIVERSITY IS STUDYING ESP THE DATA IS THERE FOR ANY ONE LOOKING FOR IT AND THERE IS ENOUGH TO AT THE LEAST WARRENT FURTHER INVESTIGATION FACT |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Dec 7, 2007 Views: 862 | RE: evidence Yes, of course cj, there is absolutely tons of evidence, we believe you, of course we do. Who could possibly dispute all this evidence you keep presenting us with? Yep, rv and ESP and all the rest must be a genuine established fact. You have all the proof needed, sure you do. Well that's that settled once and for all then. Bye cj. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Dec 7, 2007 Views: 850 | RE: RE: evidence keith your like a mad child princenton university studys rv yet somehow ? to you mr .iknow everything there is no credible people studying rv ?hmmmm according to keith it doesnt exist and has no evidence .wow its clear your in denial and no matter what you say there is evidence to warrent further investgation you make me repeat myself you dont listen ,i want you to present something definitve that discounts esp's existance i bet you cant you have presented nothing at all and all youve got going for you is that your grammar is better so the skeptics agree with you what a joke your a joke and a discrace to science |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Dec 16, 2007 Views: 796 | RE: evidence Looks like no ones interested in your nonsense cj. See all my other comments that have already answered these points many times over, no point in keep on repeating myself simply because you have some sort of problem with comprehending my replies. Why do you keep on repeating the same old stupid and pointless questions over and over, even though they have been repeatedly answered? Do you suffer from some sort of compulsive repetitive disorder? You can get treatment for that. |
| Posted By: Fourlock Posted On: Feb 23, 2008 Views: 736 | RE: evidence Yep keith you are right, the evidence is there.. the thing is this: in theory its possible whe just don't know how to trigger it + we dont know if humans would be able to trigger it.. heck even slowing down time is possible (theory of relativity) doesn't mean its possible to slow down time as human and never be late any more.. I am just saying all is possible not all can be applied sry for the bad english, and I hope my opinion will mean something to people reading this Grtz from the Netherlands |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Feb 24, 2008 Views: 734 | RE: evidence You are wrong. There is NOTHING in theory to suggest that ESP, TK, or any other paranormal activity is possible. The slowing down of time by relativity is an established and tested fact. You need to sort out fact from theory, and lack of theory. |
| Posted By: Derek Posted On: Mar 19, 2008 Views: 724 | RE: RE: RE: evidence Keith, you just completely mis-read everything he just said, he supports you on the fact that slowing down time is possible, but telekinesis is still a theory, one that has not yet been proven, OR unproven. I think you need to stop being so critical of our views and maybe be a little less skeptical. You have not yet shown in any of your statements or rants that any respectible or renowned scientist HAS NOT disproven telekinesis, if anything, we are closer to actually proving it. CJ is actually correct in saying that at the UoP (University of Princeton), they actually have started to come a short distance into the proof of telekinesis, nothing so much as to be considered actual proof, but it is a step in the right direction, unlike your "James Randi" views which are completely irrational (The man actually had a law suit filed against him because he was constantly harassing the psychic, despite a psychic actually performing telekinesis [while I am almost one hundred percent sure this was staged, Randi was not able to prove so] still did not pay up and ultimately ended losing the law suit that was filed against him). My point is, you really are in no position to state anything that you believe to be proof because of your uninformed and reasonably doubtful arguments. Please pick up a book about telekinesis or remote viewing before entirely disregarding to one day actually be fact. And I really do think, regardless of the lack of proper grammar and puncuation that CJ has, it would be best to atleast look into his insight, some of the most brilliant people that I know, happen to have poor in either of the two areas. And no, just because I know them and you do not, does not in any way discredit the statement due to the fact that CJ did have a good point aswell as good information that if you were to look into, would prove that him, and myself are entirely correct in that manner. Please do not respond with the typical Keith statements that I have read that go on to say things like "You are stupid for believeing in telekinesis" or something along the lines of "I proved that I can move a psi ball with hot water so telekinesis cannot exist" or even the infamous Keith statement "no respectible scientist will tell you he believes in telekinesis" because I happen to have just cited one below this paragraph showing you a respected scientist who is a professor at a very highly respected school known as Princeton, so if you will not respond properly in a sophisticated and well thought out manner, please do not respond to this topic anymore and realise that you DO NOT know everything. -Derek http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/lifestyle/lifestyle/view_article.php ?article_id=28286 |