Total Comments 2112 | Start A New Comment
Post Info Comment
Posted By: Shambhu Natn Thakur

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 1232
Kaise Banega IIT

Kaise Bahega IIT , Jab Bihar kaa janamat is had tak banta hua hai ki Lalu hajar paap kare usake voter usi ko vote denge.

Aur pada likha upper caste youth like Akshhay/Secularist(read opposite) Bihar se jyada Modi ki chinta kare.

Modi klog Bihari labourers ko jalayen tab v Modi k hi saath( Logic- akhir migrate karane ki jaroorat kya hai,kam karo mere khet mein kam majaduri par)

Modi ki party state ko baante tab v usi k saath aur Jharkhand k hi saath( Ek baar Dhrub Bhagat kaa naam?- Nahin Jharkhand ki sarakar chali jayegi)

Aur Modi Videsh jakar Biharion par thuke tab v Modiye ke saath.

Kahan se Banega IIT.

Bhala ho Bihar mein rahane wale Lalu k garib Votaron kaa aur Unchi Jati k samajhadar logo kaa.Isbaar unhone vakt ki najakat ko samajha.

Nahin to ill-literate NRB logon kaa to akal ghas charane Gujarat chala gaya hai. Bihar kaa bhala vo kya sochenge


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 1255
Ye lijiye Guptaji ne broad brush fir se chala diya

Calamity equals cash


The latest scam from Bihar’s floodplains tells you why the state is in terminal decline





Posted online: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 at 0047 hours IST



Juxtapose two scenarios and the sheer cruelty and callousness of Bihar’s guardians become patent. On the one hand are the tens of thousands of the flood-affected, deprived of all their worldly possessions by forces over which they have no control, scrambling for the piteous government relief that comes their way, braving police bullets to lay their hands on a packet of foodgrain or a sachet of water. On the other, we have cynical time-servers masquerading as administrators, who expend their talent and energy not to help the afflicted but to profit from their misery, by cooking up books, making false claims and, generally, siphoning off large amounts of cash through fictitious accounts. Some are so skilled at staging these charades, that they occasionally catch the eye of the global media and bask awhile in public glory, even while the flood victims themselves are quickly forgotten.

The man in the middle of the Bihar Flood Scam, which The Sunday Express has just brought to light, appears to be one of this tribe. His involvement — as the then district magistrate of Patna — in the present scandal will now be thoroughly investigated. Hopefully. But does the buck stop with him? That is the question which demands an answer in a state well-known for scandals involving the spiriting away of public funds. This question arises because of a string of other questions. Why, for instance, was this particular individual given complete charge of the entire corpus earmarked for flood relief? There are, after all, some 38 districts magistrates in Bihar. Also, why was the state’s chief secretary so lethargic about taking action in the case although signs of the scam had surfaced months ago?

It has become commonplace to talk about how just 15 paise of every development rupee actually reaches the intended beneficiary. The present scam eloquently captures how this actually happens. If Bihar is India’s poorest state today, it is also because it has been singularly unfortunate in those who have been given charge of the state, both as political leaders and as administrators. This is a state that has witnessed the tentacles of the fodder scam wrap itself around chief ministers and bureaucrats alike. To this day, RJD chief Laloo Prasad Yadav finds himself politically strapped by the case. Yet nobody seems to have learnt any lessons. Trucks continue to be sent to areas where there are no roads. Relief consignments of food end up containing only plastic bags. Agencies put in charge of supplying relief material are suddenly peopled by ghosts. Bihar never seems to run out of mysteries. Or scandals.






Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 999
kash lalooji iit ke liye bhi kudate

The Union ministry of human resources development has decided to upgrade BE College (now university) and Jadavpur University (faculty of engineering and technology) to the level of IITs.
..................

lalooji pon thokate hain khali Modi ji ko dekh ke.. aur i dekhiye communiston ko bengal ke liye nikalwa liye iit.. lalooji ka bhi itana powr abhi hai ki nikalawa len ak iit bihar ke liye par unko in bekaar ke kaam mein abhiruchi nahin rahti hai.. unko shahbudden ka image save karna jyada mahatwapurna kaam lagta hai


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 980
waise chhutbhaiya neta auron party ka bhi hai

[par raja aur guru ghantaal hain lalooji.. unka raj tha so jab baraai unki achche kaam ke liye to buraai bhi unki hi g\hogi chori chakari ke liye..

i chhot machhaliyon ka ka hain shalle dal badalte rahte hain aaj rjd to kalh bjp...


Posted By: News

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 959
IIT status in sight for two Bengal varsities

The Union ministry of human resources development has decided to upgrade BE College (now university) and Jadavpur University (faculty of engineering and technology) to the level of IITs.


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 941
Are kauno bihar se apni tulana nahin karna

chahta aur ismien unki buraai nahin hai hamari buraai hai.. i jhuthe mutthe ke mudda na banaiye..

aur han hamane i bhi suna hai osma bin laden ke against credible evidence hai. piles of .. sir ham secularist ke editorial se kaam nahin chalgea .. modiji pe chargesheet lana hai to kuchh saboot chahiye hoga..


Posted By: Shambhu Natn Thakur

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 940
Ab chaliye baki baat kal

Ab chaliye baki baat kal samay milane se karenge.


Posted By: Shambhu Natn Thakur

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 940
suna hai Osma- Bin- Laden v Paisa - kauri k Mamale

Jaa t Kendra se leke Jharkhand tak kaa sarakare nu gir jayega.

Mane Modi kaa baat isliye karana pada ki jab uu sareaam London mein Biharion koo gariata hai to Mokama k Pahalwaan jee kidhar munh se naam nahin ucharate hain.

Vaise suna hai Osma- Bin- Laden v Paisa - kauri k Mamale mein chor nahin hai.


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 922
Kya kahte hain idea sahi hai ki nahin

Here are few - Lalu Yadav ( Yadav, RJD)

Jagannath Mishra( Bramhan, JD-U)

Dhrub Bhagat (Bania -BJP)

Rajo Singh ( Bhumihar- Congress)
...................

ham kahte hain line se i sab netaon ko khara karke goli se uraa diya jaye


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 914
Thakur saheb list mein ham Modi ka naam to nahin

dekhe rahe hain.. i ka hai Modi aapke bhagwaan hain ka ki gahe bagahe matlab ho ya na ho aap Modiji ka naam ha haal mein japate hain..

Modiji ke bare mein unke katr Sushman M J Akbar ka kahna hai: He is neither corrupt nor corruptible...

Is liye kripa kar ke jab chor uchakkon ka fehrisht taiyyar kar rahe hon na to imaandar logon ko bakash dijiye..


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 909
Bekare mein larte hain ham log

I dekhiye kaise NDA congress sab ak sath mil ke doodh bhat ka khel khel rahe hain.. sasuri janta bekaar mein larti rahti hai aur ye rajneta log sab andar se mile huye hain..

NDA's perfidy on foreigner issue

A Surya Prakash

A fortnight ago, leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party were stunned by the caustic remarks of Mr KS Sudarshan, the sarsanghchalak of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh about the party and the quality of Government provided by the BJP when it was in power. While senior leaders of the BJP including Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Mr LK Advani have preferred silence to a slanging match with the RSS chief, Mr Brajesh Mishra, who was then, the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, has chosen to take on Mr Sudarshan.




Mr Mishra was particularly piqued by the RSS chief's accusation that he (Mr Mishra) was aligned to both Ms Gandhi and the BJP. Stung by these remarks, Mr Mishra hit back saying that Mr Sudarshan's comments were inane and absurd. He told The Indian Express that Mr Sudarshan was prone to making wild, fictitious allegations.



Is Mr Sudarshan completely off the mark or is there some basis for his accusations against the BJP's top leadership and the NDA Government? Given the raging controversy within the Sangh parivar on these issues, there is need to sift fact from fiction.



The BJP raised the foreigner issue many years ago and made it a key campaign point in the run-up to the 1994 as well as the 2004 elections. Meeting after meeting, leaders of this party told voters that for the sake of national pride and national security, they must ensure that only a natural-born Indian headed the Union Government. Ms Sonia Gandhi, by virtue of her Italian origin, was unfit to be the prime minister, they said. Given these assertions, the general perception was that the party was committed to the position that naturalised citizens should be kept out of constitutional offices. Available evidence suggests that this is more fiction than fact.



It may surprise readers to know that despite this public posturing, the BJP-led Government took deliberate steps to clear the way for foreigners. Further, while the people were made to believe that the party was fighting a political battle with Ms Sonia Gandhi and people around her, elements in that Government were shielding some of her friends.



There are three reasons why I say this: (i) The cunningly executed amendment of the Citizenship Act to remove a major obstacle in the path of naturalised citizens seeking political office in India; (ii) the NDA Government's preposterous assertions in an affidavit before the Delhi High Court in a case pertaining to Ms Gandhi's citizenship; and (iii) the NDA Government's refusal to grant permission to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to prosecute Mr Satish Sharma in respect of cases pertaining to petrol pump allotments made by him.



While the world at large believed that the BJP leadership stood committed to barring naturalised citizens from constitutional offices, the Government led by it pushed through the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003, in the Rajya Sabha on December 18, 2003. It was introduced in the Lok Sabha the very next day and passed by that House on December 22. Thereafter, the Government acted hastily to obtain the President's assent on January 7, 2004.



The Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Bill claimed that it had two main purposes: Creation of a new category of citizens called Overseas Citizens, to grant dual citizenship to the Indian diaspora, and introduction of a scheme for compulsory registration of every citizen of India and issuance of national identity cards. These objectives were indeed laudable, but embedded in these provisions was a politically significant pro-foreigner provision, which the Statement of Objects made no mention of!



The amendment, which had the effect of weakening the case against naturalised citizens like Ms Sonia Gandhi, was that relating to Section 5 of the Act. The section refers to a category of citizens called Citizens by Registration, which includes foreigners who marry Indian citizens. Section 5 said that subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, such persons could be granted citizenship. This Section also had a proviso which was most inconvenient for Citizens by Registration. It said: "Provided that in prescribing the conditions and restrictions subject to which persons of any such country may be registered as citizens of India under this clause, the Central Government shall have due regard to the conditions subject to which citizens of India may, by law or practice of that country, become citizens of that country by registration."



Deciphering this mumbo-jumbo: With such a law coming into force, if a foreigner marries an Indian citizen and applies for Indian citizenship, the Government should, while granting citizenship to that person, impose such conditions and restrictions as may be imposed on an Indian seeking citizenship under similar circumstances in the applicant's country of origin. In other words, this proviso makes it incumbent on the Government to ensure reciprocity to ensure that a Citizen by Registration does not acquire civil and political rights which are not available to Indians seeking citizenship in the applicant's country. Strange but true, the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill deleted this important proviso removing the biggest legal impediment faced by foreigners nurturing political ambitions. The NDA could not have given a better gift to Ms Gandhi! Why did the NDA Government remove this provision? Why was it done in stealth? Who in the Government was batting for Ms Gandhi?



That the Government's intentions were not sanguine are obvious from the Statement of Objects and Reasons that was appended to that Bill. Apart from the fact that it made no reference to the deletion of this important proviso, it actually tried to mislead Members of Parliament and citizens by saying that the purpose of the amending bill was to make acquisition of Indian citizenship by registration and naturalisation more stringent!



The other act of the BJP-led Government which ran contrary to its public utterances vis-à-vis the foreigner issue, was the Counter Affidavit filed by the Central Government before the Delhi High Court on September 5, 2001, in the Rashtriya Mukti Morcha Case. In this affidavit, the Government repeatedly asserted that there was only one class of citizens in the country. Once citizenship is acquired, there remained no distinction in the citizens thereafter, it said. This assertion, which is blatantly false, was made 17 times in the said Affidavit.



Anyone who reads 'The Citizenship Act, 1955' can see the distinction between Citizens by Birth and other category of citizens. While citizenship is permanent for Citizens by Birth, it is impermanent in respect of Citizens by Registration and Citizens by Naturalisation. No Government has the power to interfere with the citizenship of a Citizen by Birth.



However, the citizenship of those who come under the other categories is subject to conditions and restrictions. These citizens have to comply with the conditions stipulated in Section 10 of the Act at all times. Should citizens falling under these categories violate these provisions, their citizenship can be cancelled. Further, this affidavit was filed on September 5, 2001, when the proviso to Section 5 of the Act (reciprocity clause) was still intact. Therefore, the argument, "There is no distinction among different categories of citizens," was, to say the least, preposterous.



Finally, a word on the NDA Government's kindness towards Ms Gandhi's friends. The most glaring example was the Government's refusal to grant permission to the CBI to prosecute Mr Satish Sharma. While its own minister Mr Ram Naik was pilloried by the Congress party for favouring friends in the allotment of petrol pumps, the BJP was unwilling to permit the CBI to proceed against former Petroleum Minister Satish Sharma, who faced similar charges.



Who in the NDA Government had put a protective shield around Satish Sharma? Who was behind the hidden agenda in the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003 and the affidavit? There are obviously some embedded Sonia-men in the BJP. The BJP cannot hope to retrieve its lost ground unless its top leadership is ready to identify those who betrayed the cause, and weed them out.


Posted By: Shambhu Natn Thakur

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 901
Bihar mein Patni aapane pati kaa naam nahin leti

Withdrawals allegedly began in 1978 and continued until 1996. Scam surfaced in 1996

Fair list.

EVERY POLITICAL PARTY (Congress, RJD, BJP, JD-U) and ALL THE CASTE and RELIGION, including Bhumihar, Yadav, Bramhin and Musalaman and entire range of elit class from IAS to politicians get the proper representation in charge-sheet filed today for fodder scam.

EE sachamuch secular list hai.


Here are few - Lalu Yadav ( Yadav, RJD)

Jagannath Mishra( Bramhan, JD-U)

Dhrub Bhagat (Bania -BJP)

Rajo Singh ( Bhumihar- Congress)

Enjoy the entire list- http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/2031_1336614,0065000300000000.htm

But the problem with Pahalwaan jee is he can not take the name of persons like Dhrub Bhagat and Modi where it is needed.
Bihar mein Patni aapane pati kaa naam nahin leti hai.

Jai ho sikiya Pahalwaan!



Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 875
Lalooji Mukhya MAntri the tab i sab huaa

ak minute ke liye log maan bhi le ki lalooji nahin koi aur chori kiya .. chuki ye chori ak din nahin varshon tak hoti rahi .. fir isse kya pata chalta hai lalooji ka nikammapan agar choripan nahin..

koi bhi raja itane bare chori ke baad ya to pata karta ki kaun liya hai ya firjanta janardan se maafi mang ke sanyas le leta ye kah ke ki wo shashan ke layak nahin hai..

par lalooji kee theterlogy dekhiye wo lage hain chillane mein ki maine nahin liya maine nahin liya.. are ham kahte hain jisne bhi liya chuki aap khajana ke malik the is liye ya to us chor ko dhundh ke laiye ya ram ram karke banbaas jaiye..


Posted By: Secularist

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 872
Man u guys take things too personally

calm down..


Posted By: Shambhu Natn Thakur

Posted On: Apr 25, 2005
Views: 875
Pahalwan jee kidhar gaye?

Ee Dhrub Bhagat, Narendra Modi kaa naan aate hi Pahalwaan jee kahin chale Jate hain.

Pata nahin Mokama ki America


Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ] Next Page ->