| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 9, 2005 Views: 611 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? I am going to conclude wording on this site due to personal lack of interest. Consider this an "exit". So far the information has been worthwhile, but I am still not getting what I need for some true direction. I will keep everything I can that I do learn from Keith Mayes for my own reasons, since we are universes apart from the same power. He hasn't heard all of the excuses, and he doesn't know all he needs to know. Fantasy is a word caught in the trap of "zero" charge, as far as I am concerned. Fantasy in the telekinetic world will never fit until there is proof. It is an abusive and disrespectful word to challenge fact. I can't accept it. I refuse to. I will gladly move out of zero with 'fact' or 'unproven fact', there are only two choices one is forced to endure. These are my concluding statements. I will come back and keep an eye on the site, but will say no more - unless there is enough demand. - Thank you - Peter James Flack. - |
| Posted By: Zack Posted On: Jun 9, 2005 Views: 605 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? Peter Flack... You are a disturbing individual. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 10, 2005 Views: 596 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? That tongue, Zack, has fingers on that keyboard, waiting with "baited breath", for someone or something to hit the center of that "hole". |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 10, 2005 Views: 595 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? You can move from video, to view, to video, back and forth. On and on, and soon enough the words will dissapear. Not even words can escape the unending event horizon created here. So I word no more. Disturbed enough from this site. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 11, 2005 Views: 584 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? I had to know something. If Keith Mayse has studied astronomy, physics, and other fields for 45 years, am I mistaking him for an imposter in ways I cannot possibly know what I am saying half of the time? If some imposter says "I will continue to say loud and clear that it TK does not exist, because it has never been demonstrated, if you can prove it, I will prove I can walk on water.", am I going into some deep end? If the only way I can demonstrate this unheard of TK for the first time in human history, would this (what-60-70something yr.old man)is through technological means only in measurement, would he take me seriously if he can't see or hear it? I only challenge his degree of TK because all I see are hands. I will never be convinced until I see a 'whole' person demonstrate it and claim it to be TK for all it is worth. But, why turn and say it doesn't exist? This is the most mind-boggling of all things. If he didn't know people like me existed out here, why set himself up and say that, AND use the word fantasy? Why? I don't get it. ...He didn't know about me, granted, but why take the chances in words and bury yourself in an intellectual grave? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 11, 2005 Views: 582 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? Has he even said one word yet? Some of the first, early posts in the 2004 area don't sound like a 65-75 year old astronomer. Maybe some cocky young British (ass of himself) who has no defense, but from what I see, there is only one account of words here I can validate as him. To the point of "I know all I need to know about TK, it doesn't exist.". This last comment is purely based in the "ignorance of evidence" section of the 4 forms of the proof of paranormal. The word "all" is ignorance and un-proven anecdotal evidence. The videos are misinterpreting evidence. So seriously, Keith Mayes, do you in one word- Yes or No - is all it takes - believe there is an imposter in the site? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 569 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? -3 days later- You understand now. This is exactly the reaction I was expecting. Like you Keith Mayes, was just at the point of a close encounter of the 3rd kind and you don't know what language to use or what to say. You have to understand, that whenever I enter this message board I am forced to vote "yes","no", or "I don't know". For which I have no category. I agree upon the terms that I am 51% "I don't know" as unproven fact is concerned. The other 49% "yes" because I am confident of myself and I know my own body, and no one tells me that telekinesis does not exist. It is like saying you know my body more than I do. In this case, you do not. Do you even have a category Mr.Mayes? I understand that you did not actually say you would respond on the message board, this I am aware of. - There are words that I regret "firing away" at you in concern with the Soviet Union, 'the ring on your finger', and the videos of something I think you wish to be left alone as they are as unproven fact. --------- Years ago, I learned of a Russian individual whom could put his hands directly over a frog, without touching it, and stop it's heart in moments time. This was what I meant by that statement. ---------Remember when I said "forget about the British gut"? It was actually a mis-typing that I regreted for a while that I soon realized wasn't that bad. It fitted into that same kind of "category". What I truly meant by that is, that there was a 'countdown' for someone in Britain to have U.F.O.s appear in some voluntary connection to him. For which there are no results, yet. I found out you were U.K. related afterwards, and do not mean to offend you by any means. ---------Seriously, forget about the British guy.-----------I have a feeling he will not get the James Randi prize anytime soon. ------------As for me, I have an goal in mind. I still have the utmost intention, to attain that prize by whatever means necessary.-----------Your "chicken feed" comment, I regret nothing in saying, is uncalled for. That is not meant to be a comparison, for what is truly a capability yet unproven, that you sir, have not proven. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 568 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? May I rest my case? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 14, 2005 Views: 567 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? Placebo? Don't worry about what questions I drilled before, I will withdraw them. Thank you for your input again, there was two sentences you mentioned that described what my life is like. I think you know what they are. They have an extra-ordinary affection towards what I go through everyday, that I do not cease to think about. Thank you. |
| Posted By: Placebo Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 550 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? Huh? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 24, 2005 Views: 545 | RE: Telekinesis: Fact or Unproven Fact? The words you mean in slavery and the lack there-of. Thank you. |
| Pages [ 1 2 ] |