| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> What do you think of this | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: What do you think of this |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jul 12, 2005 Views: 742 | RE: What do you think of this You're right nicktk1, we are stupid. So stupid we don't even know your email address. So stupid in fact we can't even imagine how you could prove TK over the internet anyway, even if we did email you. It must be wonderful being as smart as you, and believing in TK. It must make you a very happy person being so fcuking smart. All I can say is if you're smart, then I'm fcuking glad I'm stupid. |
| Posted By: Random1 Posted On: Jul 12, 2005 Views: 734 | RE: What do you think of this hahahahahahahahahahahahaha |
| Posted By: Joey Posted On: Jul 18, 2005 Views: 709 | RE: What do you think of this Yea i want some proof. I kinda think it is real myself. |
| Posted By: nicktk1 Posted On: Jul 20, 2005 Views: 702 | RE: What do you think of this OK, just e-mail me |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Jul 21, 2005 Views: 694 | RE: What do you think of this nicktk1 can you atually prove it yourself, or do you have a cheese-ball video of someone else performing it. Which judging by your age of 12 you really believe! And turn your fricking CAPS LOCK OFF!!! |
| Posted By: nick Posted On: Jul 27, 2005 Views: 672 | RE: What do you think of this *rasies hand* |
| Posted By: bogdan Posted On: Aug 28, 2005 Views: 630 | RE: What do you think of this Using my high psy abilities , I feel that this guy ... it's joking =)) ha ha ha -> "YOU PEOPLE ARE STUPID....I HAVE PROOF THAT IT EXSISTS YOU WANT IT E-MAIL ME" |
| Posted By: Anthony Posted On: Sep 1, 2005 Views: 628 | RE: What do you think of this Well the main reason so many do the pencils and stuff is because thats how others supposedly learned. I however can say that I beleive telekinesis possible mainly because I was able to witness it first hand. The reason from what Ive been told that there are not so many documented cases of telekinesis is because it occurs randomly. Im not sure on the authenticity of the videos, but however Ive learned that just because I may think one way doesnt mean its not possible. Again I would use the same argument as No one has proven it to be possible, and yet no one has proven it impossible. One man James A. Conrad, has even come up to a theory as to how it works, and even some form of formula. He beleives it has to do with electomagnetic fields within our body and also suggests eating meats for it iron content. Hes supposedly done telekinesis randomly, and thats how he came to decide to research and experiment. The point is there are numerous claims obviously and if someone did it right in front of a skeptic, theyd still claim it was most likely faked. As Ralph Waldo Emerson or Rudyard Kipling (cant remember) said "The fault finder will find fault even in paradise." Why not study it for your self and try some of the techniques and maybe even go as far as using physics to prove your hypothesis on the possibility of telekinesis. Scientists have been able to teleport Atoms by now, and if gone farther may even be able to teleport molecules depending on more research. Theyve even split atoms and discovered when one part of it was moved the other part of the atom despite distance was forced to do the same movement with no means of any Physical contact. I would think if this is possible why would it not be possible for telekinesis to happen ? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Sep 1, 2005 Views: 623 | RE: What do you think of this Anthony, Using your argument you may as well say.... I would think if this is possible why would it not be possible for Keith Mayes to destroy entire planets with a snap of his fingers? It makes as much sense. |
| Posted By: Anthony Posted On: Sep 1, 2005 Views: 620 | RE: What do you think of this Judging by your response I dont even think you understand anything I said. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Sep 2, 2005 Views: 618 | RE: What do you think of this And judging from your comment you obviously have not read my pages on how I tested TK using physics, tried some of the techniques and how I duplicated the two main TK stunts using physics. This is what you said....."Why not study it for your self and try some of the techniques and maybe even go as far as using physics to prove your hypothesis on the possibility of telekinesis." So why don't you open your mind and read what I have discovered to prove my case that TK does not exist? Or would you rather just carry on believing anyway, regardless of the facts? If you want to criticise me fine, but it would be a good idea to read what I have to say first! It may help stop your comments from looking very foolish. |
| Posted By: Anthony Posted On: Sep 3, 2005 Views: 615 | RE: What do you think of this I read the experiments quite a while ago. But those experiments simply test the pin wheel, no other objects were tested. What about the case with pencils, or even larger objects people have claimed to move. I didnt get over my skepticism, by seeing a paper spin around on a wheel. When you test it would be a good idea to try other objects. And if the tests show no telekinesis involved then thats more for you to go on. Simply testing one thing doesnt give the same results as when you test a multitude of things. In labs a scientist can test the same thing over and over and come up with diffrent results or causes. You are the Scientist in this case and your Hypothesis is telekinesis is not possible. You've done good, and have proved that there are other things then telekinesis that are spinning the wheel. The next move would be to figure out the cause of spinning highlighters, and rolling pencils. How can you recreate this phenomena without telekinesis. Can you fake it ? Yes it is possible to fake it but you'll have to prove that its faked or fake it your self and see if it can be convincing. I myslef question some of the videos but as I said being able to witness it firsthand has left me open to the idea. And when conducting the experiments keep in mind most scientists the ones who believe its possible and get funding to study the idea, say most of it is usually a random event, also try experimentation with the electromagnetic energy being emitted by your body and how it can affect things around it. |
| Posted By: Anthony Posted On: Sep 3, 2005 Views: 614 | RE: What do you think of this P.S. I just re-read your response and would like to say Im not critisizing you. I understand that people see things diffrently. The purpose of discussions of course (sorry Pointing out the obvious.) is to consult with others and learn diffrent views of things and then to come up with your own. Im sorry if I appeared to be speaking in a negative tone, its not intentional |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Sep 4, 2005 Views: 608 | RE: What do you think of this The thing is Anthony where do you draw the line? i took the psi-wheel and straw-on-a-bottle because they are the two that every TK site says to start with. After much testing and experimenting I eventually managed to show that the movement of both had nothing to do with TK and everything to do with normal physics. Do I have to do the same for pecils, pens, highlighters, coins, keys etc. etc? And how can I test a thing if I can't make it happen? I have never been given a demonstration showing any of those objects moving by TK, and never will. As I keep saying, it's up to the Tkers to prove they have TK, and nobody ever has, or ever will |
| Posted By: Anthony Posted On: Sep 5, 2005 Views: 605 | RE: What do you think of this Well then I guess the line would be were its decided to be drawn. On these types of subjects its hard to know where to start its study and where to end it but its soley up to whom ever is seeking the so called truth or understanding of the thing being invesigated. Most start their study where others have began and have had "progress". However you proved that the pinwheel and straws are not demonstrating telekinesis. If telekinesis exists then one thing we now know is that the pinwheels and straws are not reliable in testing telekinesis. But yet then if we were to continue with the assumption telekinesis is possible, we've hit bump in the road, where would we test now ? What could be tested ?. First I would start with looking up as many stories as possible whether they can be "credible" or not, and finding trends in the history of telekinesis and work from there, and also trying to figure out your own methods of "training" from it. Even aside from that maybe there could be genetic things involved it is assumed by others studies all can learn it but maybe some have genetic advantages. The history also of supposed telekinetics themselves would also need to be studied, to figure how and why certain "telekinetic events" supposedly took place. But as you asked, where do you draw the line ? It depends on how far you want to take it. I mean if it takes up to much time why study it, time would be better spent doing something else productive, but for those who want to take it farther thats what they'll do, if they decide to study it with pin wheels and straws then, as your research has proven its not reliable and if they want to progress they should take your research into account. Whether it may seem that way or not, your research has helped progress its study because people have found out that some experiments i.e. the pinwheel,straws. etc. are not to credible and it would probably be a better idea to take a diffrent route if they want to prove it possible or study it for themselves. We now have the opinion and results of your experimentation. Now if you want to draw the line you can, you've made a contribution to its study and if you want to retire from it, others can take your results and use it in developing there own experiments. So I cant think of much to say, thats about it. |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 ] Next Page -> |