| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> Open minded | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: Open minded |
| Posted By: wei Posted On: Jun 16, 2006 Views: 664 | RE: Open minded See, the reason why kids are viewed as inferior in the brain is because they are kids. They lived for like what? 1o-20 years? And they think they know more than people who have lived 3-4 times as long? They just don't have the experience, which is why most of naive. Mordak, I'm sure no one is rich enough to immediately pay for your flight. Just go to a well-known university in France, and tell them about your proposal. If they reject, keep trying. Many scientists like Galileo has faced rejection many times before, but were they wrong? No, and eventually their ideas were accepted. Do the same thing if you have such a strong will of proving everyone that TK is real. If you can't do it, then there is a perfectly good reason why Keith won't believe you. He's done his work of convincing his part of the arguement, so you have to do your work too. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 16, 2006 Views: 661 | RE: Open minded It doesn't matter if you think I consider myself superior. It doesn't matter one damn what I think about TK. If it existed then someone would have proven it. They haven't. It doesn't exist. What part of that is so hard to understand? |
| Posted By: Woodpecker Posted On: Jun 23, 2006 Views: 650 | RE: Open minded Hmm. It took a long time to prove that the atom could be split... |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 23, 2006 Views: 648 | RE: Open minded Splitting the atom has nothing to do with TK, no matter how long it took. People have been claiming to do TK for bleeding years, yet no one has ever done more than talk about it. No one has actually done it in front of anyone worth convincing! I wonder why? The answer is obvious to anyway capable of rational and logical thought. |
| Posted By: Woodpecker Posted On: Jun 28, 2006 Views: 642 | RE: Open minded No, you misunderstand me. Somebody said to themselves, "I think it is possible to split the atom." Then after a long series of experiments and developments in technology, somebody did split the atom. My point is, just because nobody had done it in the 16th Century didn't mean it couldn't be done. Your rationale is "If it hasn't been done, it can't be." So you see, if it hasn't been done, that doesn't mean it can't be done. |
| Pages [ 1 2 ] |