| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> spoon bending | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: spoon bending |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 854 | RE: spoon bending Sorry cj you scored zero. I would have thought that with 5 photos you would have got at least one lucky guess right. Guessing about a beach scene was a good try, but wrong. The thing is if you could really do it you would only need ONE photo. Giving you 5 makes it 5 times more likely that you will guess one right. If I gave you 20 then even easier. You actually had 11 guesses and still didn't get one right. These are the photos. 1) a robin on a snow covered bird table 2) a deer in the forest. 3) a garden cobweb covered in dew backlit by the sun 4) a close up of the head of a red rose 5) a man fishing from a boat on a lake No surprises there then. Remote viewing does not exist. I am sure Delphinus will confirm the photos. |
| Posted By: Delphinus Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 850 | RE: spoon bending hey guys, I can most definately confirm that the photo's keith has described was what was e-mailed to me... Cj, i suggest the next time you say you can do something make sure you can prove it! Otherwise you look like an idiot! |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 845 | RE: spoon bending altho i would not at all consider this a success i did describe some of them u said there was a sun in one of the pics |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 843 | RE: spoon bending i saw water and sand .keith would you like to set up another |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 842 | RE: spoon bending and keith you know it is statisically impossible to quess even 1 out of 5 pics because theres litterally 1000's of different pics that could have been selected the chances of me getting anything was not very likly |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 841 | RE: spoon bending and even tho this session was vague compared to my usuals,theres still no way u can explain how i knew there was a sun and how there was body of water,id be glad to do another |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 838 | RE: spoon bending cj, You are talking total garbage, as per usual. There is not one single picture with the sun in it, it does not feature in any of them, apart from the rather obvious fact that being outdoors they are all lit by the sun! Also there is not a beach scene either, you say you saw water and sand, that did not feature in any photo! Claiming a body of water featured in one of them is ridiculous, you may as well say land featured in some of them. Stop being so silly. You failed miserably and anyone reading this will totally agree. As for doing another, what would be the point in that? Grow up. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 836 | RE: spoon bending ok keith when remote viewing you recieve images visions clues not the whole pic!so lets say you had a pick of a rose i i wrote a flower pot hmmmm what does that symbolize or somone fishing on water i saw water , |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 829 | RE: spoon bending I see, so when you are remote viewing you don't actually remote view it, you just get little clues (from where or what?) as to what it might be. How does that work then? I thought you were supposed to be seeing it, not working out crossword clues. I have a photo of the head of a rose but you see a flower pot and claim that is a hit, even though the rose in question is growing in the ground and not a flower pot in sight, let alone in the picture! I can just see it now, a remote viewing person (do the have a name other than idiot?) working for the government and spying out enemy territory for weapons and says he sees a flower pot nearby when in reality it is a rose bed, Oh yes, that would be such a help. Plus we have a spy fishing on a lake in the middle of a vast moor, and you say you can see him on the beach. Wonderful! Have you no idea how silly you make yourself sound? Just to prove my point I will give you one last chance. This time it is with just a single clear simple picture. There is no fudging this one, either you get it right or you will be totally wrong, its so obvious. As before I will tell Delphinus what it is, I will do it right now. Okay go for it. Once again you will be totally wrong and I will NOT be bothering with this garbage any more. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 29, 2007 Views: 826 | RE: RE: spoon bending remote viewing is real and alot of smart people with better credentials then you agree/i know it is and this unscientific experiment we tryed was very vague and i made it clear i do not consider it a success i have many many hits that cannot be accounted for that were so dead on theres no denying and if it werent for those hits i would not believe rv exist and i will present the results of the skeptic/believer experiments aikiboy111111 will be doing lets see if there really is in tech terms the so called psi effect there will be no possibility of deception and will be a very skeptical look at remote viewing and whether there is any effect that cannot be explained away by statisical probability u can look him up |
| Posted By: Delphinus Posted On: Oct 30, 2007 Views: 823 | RE: spoon bending Hey cj, Just to let you know that i did get another description of a picture from Keith. If you're so good and you believe in this whole-heartedly you should be able to guess it no problems, right? |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 30, 2007 Views: 821 | RE: spoon bending OK cj, if you claim to have had so many correct hits then how come you got all mine wrong, and that was with you throwing in 11 wrong guesses for 5 photos! Talk is easy isn't it. Anyway, as I said, I will give you one last chance. What is the photo this time? As if you know lol! Come on then, show us all how clever you are. |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Oct 30, 2007 Views: 816 | RE: spoon bending your so wrong first of all the chances of someone describing 1 of 5 pics is so unlikly almost impossible ,and im no loinger gonna try to convince you like this your stubborn and will not change your views on how the universe works and obviously will reject anything contradicting i will present the skeptic believer test and like i said lets see if the psi effect rele exist or if it could be explained away by chance |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Oct 30, 2007 Views: 810 | RE: spoon bending So cj you give up. What a surprise! Its amazing how you CLAIM to be so good at remote viewing but when actually put to the TEST fail miserably, or I should I say laughably? You were wrong on all 5 photos and give up on the 6th. Remote viewing does not exist so get over it. Your so called 'proof' of its existence comes from very flawed test that have since been totally discounted and comes from sites that only exist to promote all things paranormal, these are generally referred to as crank sites. Believe in whatever idiotic rubbish you wish, but do not come here and tell me its real because you have not the slightest idea of how to carry out research or know the difference between a meaningful result and flawed and manipulated statistics. You have a lot to learn and need to stop being so ready to believe in a thing simply because you want to. Try being factual instead. Now go away and join one of the many sites that promote mystical garbage, because in case you haven't noticed, this one doesn't! |
| Posted By: cj Posted On: Nov 2, 2007 Views: 799 | RE: spoon bending your so wrong i wont even respond to that |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 ] Next Page -> |