| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> website | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: website |
| Posted By: Anonymous Posted On: Oct 9, 2005 Views: 657 | RE: website Who could tell the difference between his and the videos of someone who claim they used TK, they couldn't because to watch you would see no difference. ------------------------------------------------- Okay... well, I've seen a few videos that Keith can't duplicate with static or blowing. Videos showing the whole straw and face and hands of the person. No movement of hands... mouth shut and nose covered. I don't know about you, but those videos are obviously different than Keith's, considering that he used his hands with static to move the straw around. |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Oct 10, 2005 Views: 651 | RE: website LOL this section brlow from your previous post sums you up, Anonymous. If yes why don't you actually do something positive with your time and try and prove TK rather than ranting on about a couple of fricking videos and arguing about something that has NOT been proved to exist. ------------------------------------------------- I think the real question is... why do you feel it neccessary to rant on and on by posting on this board how TK doesn't exist when you obviously can't prove it doesn't exist anyways? You totally avoid the question and turn it around. What can i possibly do to prove something does not exist when it does not exist? Read what you have said, you can't complain because we can not prove TK does not exist, we are skeptical about your claims and your only evidence for the existance of TK is we can't prove TK does not exist. It makes no sense to me, it seems that you are unable to prove TK so your only reaction is to use the fact we can't prove TK as a reason that TK exists. It's a very feeble response in support of TK. What if i said i saw a man jump a entire football pitch, could you prove me wrong? |
| Posted By: Anonymous Posted On: Oct 17, 2005 Views: 640 | RE: website I didn't use your question as a means to prove that TK exits. I merely showed how screwed up your question is in the first place. |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Oct 19, 2005 Views: 636 | RE: website Yeah Right!! : D |
| Posted By: Anonymous Posted On: Oct 24, 2005 Views: 631 | RE: website I just turned your question around merely to illustrate that if you call me silly to argue FOR TK of a forum like this one, I can rightfully say you are silly to argue AGAINST it. Y'know why this is? Because yes, you call me silly to argue on a forum for its exsistence, because it can't be proven; but you are just as silly constantly spouting that it doesn't exits and what crap it is and all when you can't prove its non-existence. Really... where in that whole argument did I use your question, and turn it around to argue for the existence for TK? Nowhere apparently.... |
| Posted By: Grant Posted On: Oct 25, 2005 Views: 628 | RE: website Do you remember saying "I think the real question is..." You still keep going on about not being able to prove something not to exist!?! How the hell can that be done? Explanation PLEASE!!! If possible And answer this as you avoided it last time i asked. If i was to say a man jumped over an entire football pitch how can you prove I did not see it????? |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 ] |