| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> The "Tree". | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: The "Tree". |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 608 | RE: The "Tree". How could you not understand it is simple. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 608 | RE: The "Tree". (Reading up on things..regarding the imposter) Every time you say it is you, it is. How do you know all there is to know about TK, and are convinced it doesn't exist. Why develope a test to tell other people that this is how you find out if you have TK and you don't have it, and refer to IT as not existing. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 606 | RE: The "Tree". Every claim ever on this message board that is refered as you, is you. Do I take your word for it? Not yet, since this is metaphoric in itself. Probably the most fitting metaphor yet. I find contradictions in your (your) statements that do not fit the opening page. Not to forget that the videos have thier own (insider) flaws. I think you (you) could have telekinesis, or someone around you we do not see. --------Another factor, is it Keith Mayes in the video? Well, not to insult you, but I see your married,( if that is a ring on your finger for that reason )did you marry a woman or a man? To rephrase my last issue about that - which I dropped. What if this is not Keith Mayes on the video? IF you remove the imposters, you would very easily close some of these segments that are at the point still being observed for SOME reason right? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 604 | RE: The "Tree". Why is that? If the "other" one is waiting for you to say something that would conclude a segment and "they" agree you were intellegent enough to word it all the way to the end, am I supposed to think your the same people just because you were right? Like the other one does- sitting there like " hey, nice shot- but, your still not me ". |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 604 | RE: The "Tree". Your an astronomer, arent you supposed to understand? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 601 | RE: The "Tree". So, the imposter could say, "I remove the imposters", do you? You never really told me, the answer to the question: do you think there is an imposter. Why is it you couldn't say "no"? Did you miss that one, because maybe if you didn't, I am quite sure "he" didn't.He would not say "yes" and sits there and waits for you. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 597 | RE: The "Tree". Remember what you said (potential imposter), "Every comment on this site that claims to be me, is me. I remove the imposters.". Remember the first segment: TK is a load of ****? I do. I have the last few comments on that one. (Still not closed yet, by the way.). Was that you? Did you insult the right people as the "Dark_Mage" was warning? I don't think Keith Mayes insulted me, I think you insult me. I think you insult Keith Mayes. Is it every comment?......................I learned how to type in 7th grade, I am still working on it- - at times I am impatient and angry and type fast. Well, I see that happening with you (imposter). ......One thing I know about astronomers is that they are like fishermen (women), (children?), they have to be patient. You misspell words in impatience, and you swear in anger, without heed to the $@#$%@!$%^@#$^^@!@#$! because you have no respect for elders or the younger ones. .................. Another thing I have noticed is that you did not actually "claim" to be your name. ... Why not? Who are you waiting for? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 596 | RE: The "Tree". Do you understand that requesting for Keith Mayes to speak to me, ( amongst all of this ), I would sooner request ***** ( middle name - if any - )***** to word something in reflection, after you are literally "booted" off of the board? Why should I wait for Morse code? I didn't know someone of at least the 60 something year old stature, would be this way to one potential true telekinetic until one figured it would be of valid responsiveness. So, like I asked before, I would expect at least two middle names and two kinds of responses to the question of the imposter EXISTING. When you do not beleive YOUR telekinesis does not EXIST, it does not mean IT does not EXIST. ............ PUT THE RECORD STRAIGHT, if the burden of proof lies only with you, consider yourself not alone. IF you are the imposter, CONSIDER YOUR ASS KICKED. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 595 | RE: The "Tree". I have more respect, than to use one swear word here. Even misspelling it to try to prove a point. ....I figured by now, I was let off on the A-word. ....Some are proven wrong, and some are proven ---------- not right enough. WE are human here, we make mistakes. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 593 | RE: The "Tree". It is Saturday, I will be back on Tuesday, because of the demand- I think this site is popular. I expect to be more out of this than a "black hole" after all. I look forward to this every day. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 592 | RE: The "Tree". There to be. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 18, 2005 Views: 590 | RE: The "Tree". Why do you keep using multiple posts when just one would do? Do you think it makes you seem more important? Why do you talk in riddles? Why do you not reply to a simple question with a simple answer? Who cares? I don't! |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 573 | RE: The "Tree". I will state for the record, the contradictions involved with the name Keith Mayes on this site, and the person in front of the camera. 1) Quote: "Every comment on this site that claims to be me, is me. I remove the imposters." My question: is this true? 2) Quote: "I really don't have any TK powers." My question: is this true? 3) Quote: "So you have managed to work out that I have TK. Amazing! Well done! Yep, all those vids in my Silly Stuff section are really showing myself demonstrating TK. I just knew somebody super smart would figure it out one day." My question: is this true? This quote was located in the Hello Tk's section. As well as this stunning question - 4) Quote: "Anyone figure out yet that I am really James Randi in reality?" "No?" My question: is this true? Why Mr. Keith Mayes, your name is Keith Mayes. My question: is this true? 5) Quote: "I have no reason for believing in TK." My question: is this true? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 571 | RE: The "Tree". Correction, excuse me, 5) Quote: "I can think of no reason for believing in TK." My question: Why not? You said to someone that the videos of you are really you showing yourself demonstrating TK. My question: Isn't that what you said? I said that this site really is for you. 6)Quote: "It most certainly is, I know all I need to about TK. It doesn't exist." My question: Does it exist? My question: Does yours exist, or does it not? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 568 | RE: The "Tree". Quote: "Please do not keep referring to static, as if that was the only explanation for objects moving my non TK as there are obviously many ways." My question: could you rephrase the "my non TK" part? Another question, from the quote on the opening page:"I have proven that TK is not what is making these objects move, but instead it is warm air or static." Could you please, if you may, refer to one or the other? If you do not, the "or" in the middle, does NOT replace telekinesis. Does not explain telekinesis. Could you for the record, please state what object did you touch to cause this "static" to be so strong? It could not possibly be a hair-dryer, could it be? The following quote from "I really do not have any TK powers." I wish to question in conclusion so that this is absolutely crystal clear. Quote: "(How could I when it doesn't exist?)." My question: Does it not exist? My question: Does yours not exist? What "it" is, is not yours or it is yours. Is "my non TK" a lack there-of your telekinesis, or the nonexistence of your telekinesis? Could you answer these questions without using someone elses name? |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] Next Page -> |