| RETURN TO TELEKINESIS PAGE - TELEKINESIS -> The "Tree". | Start A New Topic | Reply |
| Post Info | TOPIC: The "Tree". |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 546 | RE: The "Tree". Peter. I |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 546 | RE: The "Tree". think |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 546 | RE: The "Tree". you |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 546 | RE: The "Tree". have |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 546 | RE: RE: RE: The "Tree". a problem |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 21, 2005 Views: 545 | RE: The "Tree". Let it be known, I will say nothing, until the one and only Keith Mayes admits there was an imposter. Otherwise I am convinced someone is "not with it upstairs" myself. |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 543 | RE: The "Tree". There is and was no Keith Mayes imposter. Does this mean that you will keep your word and say nothing? |
| Posted By: Bubbap Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 541 | RE: The "Tree". One can only hope Keith... Man talk about long winded |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 536 | RE: The "Tree". "So you have managed to work out that I have TK." "I really do not have any TK powers (how could I when it doesn't exist?)" So I have a problem understanding 3 things. 1) I can't manage to work out that you have TK. 2) You really do not have any TK powers. 3) How could you when, yours doesn't exist. I do not have a problem understanding it exists when it is not yours. So is there two people talking in saying "I have TK", "I really do not have any TK powers"? Or a misguided idiot who understands nothing about the difference between IT and ONESELF? |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 532 | RE: The "Tree". Why should I keep my word and say nothing? What is this loss of credibility when TK is identified as an energy/something/"it", and someone who says "I don't have any TK powers" admits it doesn't exist? When and if it is not yours, it does not mean it does not exist. It can exist in alot of places on this physical earth without your doing, granted. Explain the crop circles, the loss of gravity involved, is that telekinetic power? It most certainly has to be without the doing of a human being. If a human being is capable, it is that energy that belongs to them and it is it. It is for them, by them, not excluding "whatever" else happens around the globe. Take no word of credibility when someone says it isn't real, it does not exist, when if it does and it is because of you - it is simple that it is yours. The weight of the world is in the word "it" if it is not yours, you do not say it does not exist. You don't know yet. Seperate fact from fantasy. Remember this Keith, fantasy does not apply as a question. As one would have to, is forced to understand: if it comes from the body it has to go back. What goes up must come down. What goes/comes out in telekinetic energy,must have a way back in through currency. How else do you think it works in identification? What is it Keith, you want a new name for telekinesis? Seperate "it" from you, call it existing, then say it is something else. Or say nothing. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 531 | RE: The "Tree". So you think I have a problem? How come you answered only one of my questions? Is it because the only question answered takes two answers, or one person? So, on Hello TKs, it was just some figure of speech for you to say you had it, and to turn around and say you were James Randi means you do not have it and that was reverse psychology? Go ahead - say it again, don't use another name. Then you are absolutely free to tell me I have a problem. Tk is a load of **** right? Define ****. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-? or zero? Choose, choose wisely. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 524 | RE: The "Tree". If Keith Mayes has a problem with personally admitting to what his middle name is, I would apreciate the validity of that name. If, as Keith Mayes has stated before, does not take things so personally on this site, it is apreciated that he does not. So, what is your middle name Keith Mayes? If the astronomer of 45 years answers, things may settle easier. If he waits, and waits, for an imposter to answer and does so, I am satisfied with the wordless-ness. This is purely the research of telekinesis, and can not be done without absolute validity that the "teacher" Keith Mayes treats me as a student. The teacher must be present, as much as the student. So as the imposter (student) eats words, the teacher contradicts nothing of one word with absolute satisfaction. The wordless-ness is self explanitory. Any unanswered questions are also counted as the same. It is important to be critical towards the one in front of the camera as well as the one who is typing (wording). ***** (fill in space) ***** TK is a load of **** (*fill*in*space*) Remember that to say the word "load" that it requires borders. When to say TK does not exist, it is closing a door that has not been opened all the way, in the metaphoric. I refuse to see it closed. I agree to only one set of words that Keith Mayes has said and that is that you cannot prove something does not exist. I still think the "imposter" is smart enough to say it, although. I will not stop until I know the truth. |
| Posted By: Peter Flack Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 523 | RE: The "Tree". .........Funny Placebo, that you use the word "one"............ |
| Posted By: Keith Mayes Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 522 | RE: The "Tree". *Yawns* Think I'll have another drink. Hic! |
| Posted By: Placebo Posted On: Jun 22, 2005 Views: 517 | RE: The "Tree". Huh? PF - I believe you're clinically insane. I've never posted in this thread. Go get help please. |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] Next Page -> |