| Total Comments 105 | Start A New Comment |
| Post Info | Comment |
| Posted By: Posted On: Sep 17, 2000 Views: 911 | Wearing a seat belt is a wise thing to do, but should not be mandatory - except for children. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Sep 7, 2000 Views: 910 | why not? |
| Posted By: Posted On: Aug 30, 2000 Views: 912 | If the accident was not their fault, they should be allowed to collect. Obviously, if it was their fault they won't collect anything. You would have to hire experts to prove the injuries would not have happen without the use of seatbelts. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Aug 25, 2000 Views: 914 | I feel you're an idiot for not wearing a seatbelt. However, if you are not responsible for the accident, you should be reimbersed for personal/property damage. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Jul 19, 2000 Views: 945 | there is no way to determine with certainty that the injuries would not have been sustained if a seatbelt had been worn. love the site :) |
| Posted By: Posted On: Jul 6, 2000 Views: 946 | unfortunately the system we live in allows for so many loop holes that I fear the people will always be rewarded for their stupidity..... |
| Posted By: Posted On: Feb 25, 2000 Views: 948 | Not unless there is a valid medical reason for them not to wear seatbelts |
| Posted By: Posted On: Feb 24, 2000 Views: 947 | Wearing your seatbelt is the stupidest thing you can do that will save your life. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Feb 24, 2000 Views: 945 | You break the law, you default. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Feb 1, 2000 Views: 944 | 'Charging' insurance companies for compensation is just a round about way of charging all of us for the offenders stupidity. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Jan 19, 2000 Views: 935 | I agree with the comment about the mop. Just because someone makes a mistake like forgetting to put their seatbelt on once doesn't mean they caused the accident or should have to pay their own medical bills. This could be financially devistating. |
| Posted By: Posted On: Jan 15, 2000 Views: 926 | Anyone not wearing seatbelts is an idiot but to suggest that insurance companies should not cover personal injury becaused the insured did not take all precautions is wrong. Would you include motorcyclists as riskey and uninsureable? |
| Posted By: Posted On: Dec 22, 1999 Views: 905 | they shouldn't be able to collect for any damages at all, the brain damaged con't be hurt that badly anyway |
| Posted By: Posted On: Dec 17, 1999 Views: 907 | It is considered against the law in most states not to wear your seatbelt, so why should you be compensated for breaking the law? |
| Posted By: Posted On: Dec 16, 1999 Views: 905 | My 1st thought was no way...then..This is why we pay ins. premimums. And the ins. co should pay for this mistake to help heal the patient. If i slipped on water in my kitchen because I knowly left a wet mop on the floor...does the ins co not pay?? |
| Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ] |