Total Comments 135 | Start A New Comment

Post Info

Comment

Posted By: R Jaiktishna, NIALS, Kaloor Kochi Posted On: Nov 26, 2004 Views: 1390	DEATH PENALTY Death penality is an essential requirement of the present day social requirement. The legal system would be an in effective instrument with out this mode of punishment. Though it been critisised as violative of human rights still this penality is imposed in the rearest of rearest cases and only for one an only offence of murder. Death penality is the suitable punishment for a murderer, simpily because, he has no right to take ones life. Its not at all henious to these kind of animals.... Life imprisonment instead of death penality is useless.. it just waste the taxpayers money.... we pay tax to feed this animals or the scums... and that is for life time....!!!!! I dont see any greatness in it. First of all , for a muderer there is no need to examine the value of his life...its the states' responsibility to guard life of its subjects, death penality is only a retaliative measure by the state against these scums.... to me "the rarest of rare case" purely objective.... to decide a case in the proper way it is upto the competance of judges.... the accused will go through the 3 strata of judiciary(MC\Ses.C,HC,SC)... i dont think at all these levels the judges will go wrong. The accused also has the provision to seek justice under the pardoning power of the president. I strongly belive the truth always prevails, if the accused is innocent he will get justice at any point of time....with out a strong grip of law, crime will thirve daily... murderers has nothing to worry about!! DEATH PENALTY is the only factor to prevent one from doing a murder.... it necessary for them to have something to worry about.... A Murderer is is not a mentally deviant but a social deviant.... for the accused who are lunatic or suffer some psyhcatric disorder could get the the defence for death penalty under the provisions of law.... its not like considering all muderer as a lunatic and not giving him the death sentance its totaly absurd...
Posted By: Adarsh Anchal Posted On: Nov 23, 2004 Views: 1538	sex scandels Indian society fears sex.We fear to speak,show,to do..That's the case new rape-sex scandels be occured. Religious atmosphere tends people to fear this.. The Bible,Khoran,also says this way... Interestingly, old rishis in Indian mythology,they drinked,use gangas,sex with charming ladies. Some of the rishis may overflow their feeling, if he met a naked lady...that's all puranas. What's happened today? Sex,a sin- that deals in a secret way..! The unnecessary secracy and sin feeling create all scandels in India and world... Please consider it as a ordinary biological need..and give a chance to do it freely. That the remedy to rape, sex scandels.. What's yur opinion.. email me economicreview@journalist.com Adarsh Anchal
Posted By: sunil raj,kerala Posted On: Nov 20, 2004 Views: 1690	death penalty death penalty is a way to cleanse the society from evil and it should be awarded to many more crimes than is done today.murderers ,goondas ,rapists all doesnt deserve to haunt the society and the threat will serve as a deterrent.it is the corruption that has allowed the situation to become worse as it is today
Posted By: adarsh anchal Posted On: Nov 9, 2004 Views: 1701	death penalty cruel A democratic nation like, India needn't practice the death penalty. First of all, it's a violation of human right. Nor the law or government have the right to kill a human for his gilty. Life imprisonment is also a human rights violation, unless he did a serious offence that affect the entire nation. We are forcible to think about the torture behind the punishments, if it may be death penalty or imprisonment.. Nor the human be in jailed more than TWO YEARS for any crime.. We must give humanic think in the case of prisoners.. and avoid death sentences Adarsh Anchal
Posted By: jaikrishna R NIALS , Kaloor Kochi Posted On: Sep 8, 2004 Views: 4055	Death Penalty 4 A Murderer is is not a mentally deviant but a social deviant.... for the accused who are lunatic or suffer some psyhcatric disorder could get the the defence for death penalty under the provisions of law.... its not like considering all muderer as a lunatic and not giving him the death sentance its totaly absurd...
Posted By: Suhair hassan E Posted On: Sep 8, 2004 Views: 3895	Death Penalty 2 Of course states' main responsibility is safeguarding its population against any crimes, exploitation and other calamities. State safeguards its people from infective diseases by making measures to quarantine or isolate those affected with such diseases and prevents the offences of mentally incapable ones by incorporating then into mental asylums. Crimes may be seen as some sorts of mental perversions and the root cause may be traced at the gene levels and these people are not "totally fit" for social life. No state dare to kill the infected and mentally retarded persons on ground of "socially unfit nature" of life and hence death penalty which is awarded to rarest of rarest cases, i.e those committed by mentally most deviated ones,is not justifiable by any grounds. These mentally deviated criminals also belongs to the state and these ones should be "protected" from the "general public". We "tax payers" should donate some food and shelter on the basis of humanitarian concepts.
Posted By: EDGER N Posted On: Sep 5, 2004 Views: 3326	death sentence Unless and until the steps are harsh such as death penalty etc been implemented there can be no justice ,the reasons is the advocates on both sides are equally doing a job ie for the justice as well as injustice for securing a remuneration only the one who desplays skill wins the case or get prolonged. In these circumstances no murderers should be allowed a bail secondly let the court decide if convicted there should not be a life sentence except a death penalty coz the murderer has no right to end another man life so the judgement should be reciprocal. WATCH once that is implemented see how the country moves forward not only that on one would dare as he is well aware of the consequences. Here in INDIA this harse method could not be implemented as the administraters who are of that are allowed to rule and so where can there be justice and the judiciary mechanism is just a mockery.
Posted By: Jaikrishna R , NIALS,Kochi Posted On: Sep 3, 2004 Views: 886	Death penalty 3 First of all , for a muderer there is no need to examine the value of his life...its the states' responsibility to guard life of its subjects, death penality is only a retaliative measure by the state against these scums.... to me "the rarest of rare case" purely objective.... to decide a case in the proper way it is upto the competance of judges.... the accused will go through the 3 strata of judiciary(MC\Ses.C,HC,SC)... i dont think at all these levels the judges will go wrong. The accused also has the provision to seek justice under the pardoning power of the president. I strongly belive the truth always prevails, if the accused is innocent he will get justice at any point of time....with out a strong grip of law, crime will thirve daily... murderers has nothing to worry about!! DEATH PENALTY is the only factor to prevent one from doing a murder.... it necessary for them to have something to worry about....
Posted By: Adv. Ranjith Xavier Posted On: Sep 2, 2004 Views: 903	Death Penalty Death penalty is a good deterrent... it can make offenders think twice before they committ a crime... but does that stop the person from committing the crime? Remember a person can be wrongly convicted.. also remember you can be convicted in the abscence of any eye account, only on the strength of assumptions made on the basis of circumstances... what if these assumptions are wrong... further, even today, death penalty is given only in the "rarest of rare" case... what is "rarest of rare" ? .... as time rolls away, new and defenitions are invented... it is too subjective standard to play with a man's life... what is "rarest of rare" may seize to be so after a couple of years.. and vice versa. What if the crime is rarest of rare when the offence is committed and seize to be so when he is actually sentenced... An objective standard for deserving cases is to be developed. Or, make sure the criminals complete the full term of their sentence..
Posted By: Jaikrishna R Posted On: Sep 2, 2004 Views: 802	Death penality 2 Life imprisonment instead of death penality is useless.. it just waste the taxpayers money.... we pay tax to feed this animals or the scums... and that is for life time....!!!!! GREAT
Posted By: suhair hassan e Posted On: Sep 2, 2004 Views: 696	Death Penalty Death penalty should only be introduced in a country where "corruption" levels are very law and in a country like India imposing death penalty will lead to a good amount of bad "plays".Let them live and if they are too dangerous let them "in" for life time.
Posted By: Jaikrishna R Posted On: Sep 2, 2004 Views: 651	Death Penality Death penality is an essential requirement of the present day social requirement. The leagal system would be an in effective instrument with out this mode of punishment. Though it been critisised as violative of human rights still this penality is imposed in the rearest of rearest cases and only for one an only offence of murder. Death penality is the suitable punishment for a murderer, simpily because, he has no right to take ones life. Its not at all henious to these kind of animals....
Posted By: PREM SHANKAR JHA Posted On: Aug 3, 2004 Views: 1961	Loopholes in the law have been used to victimise a Bend It Like Modi Loopholes in the law have been used to victimise a cabinet minister. Updates PREM SHANKAR JHA Was it only two weeks ago that I warned readers about the way serious flaws in the criminal procedure code that allow the police to keep any Indian citizen in jail without filing charges for long periods have become instruments in the hands of unscrupulous politicians and businessmen to harass their rivals? Well, it has happened again. And this time it is not the hapless chief executive and legal advisor of a German firm who have been hounded out of the country by an estranged collaborator, but a Union cabinet minister who is being persecuted. I am, of course, referring to Shibu Soren of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The BJP was not on a belated search for justice. They merely wanted was an excuse to hound Soren out of office. The motive on this occasion is quintessentially political but it is mean and dirty politics that has brought Indian democracy to a new nadir of shame. Sometime in the middle of July, the state unit of the BJP, which currently rules Jharkhand, decided that its best chance of getting re-elected lay in timing the state assembly elections to coincide with those to be held in Bihar in six months. The plan to discredit Soren (who is easily the most towering personality in Jharkhand politics) and if possible to hound him out of the elections altogether, was hatched shortly afterwards. To do so, the Jharkhand government has dug into its case files and pulled out a flimsy charge that had lain dormant for 29 years! This was—on December 26, 1975, Soren was one of the 70 persons who had hacked to death 11 people in Chirrudih village and burned their houses. The charge was easy to formulate because at that time the JMM was a semi-insurgent group fighting for separate statehood. But for precisely that reason, it would be virtually impossible to uphold in any court of law. Which is why, like innumerable cases against Naga, Mizo, Akali and Kashmiri dissident leaders, it had never been pursued. But the BJP was not on a belated search for justice. All it wanted was an excuse to arrest Soren, disgrace him, hound him out of office and make his image in Jharkhand lose some of its lustre. On July 19, the Jharkhand government issued an arrest warrant for Soren. Not only was this against a Union cabinet minister, but the action itself was unprecedented because technically the court had to first issue summons to Soren to appear. The arrest warrant should only have been issued when he failed to appear and was declared an 'absconder'. No summons had been served on Soren before the arrest warrant was issued. What followed demonstrates how easy it has become to use what passes for 'Law' in India as an instrument of persecution and on occasion, state terror. On the same day, which was a Monday, Soren applied for bail before the Jharkhand magistrate's court. But somehow, the court could not find the time or guts, to listen to the appeal, let alone grant it. On hearing of the arrest warrant, Union home minister Shivraj Patil made a specific inquiry from the Jharkhand government on whether Soren had been declared an absconder. The director general of police made the mistake of telling him that this was not the case. The very next day, CM Arjun Munda transferred him, and put in a more pliant police officer. Shades of Narendra Modi? Two days later, the Jharkhand police descended on Delhi and posted an arrest warrant on the wall of his house declaring Shibu Soren to be an absconder. They did not feel it necessary to inform the Delhi police, or to seek its permission to carry out a law and order function on its territory. One wonders how many people realised how deeply this contempt for the union government and for union territory has undermined the already fading pre-eminence of the Centre in the Indian federal polity. They will realise it when a large state like Tamil Nadu follows Jharkhand's lead. Even that is not the end of this dismal tale.One week later, the magistrate's court in Ranchi had still not heard Mr Soren's bail application! It had also refused to hear his petition that all cases against him filed when he was leading the JMM's struggle for separate statehood should be quashed. That left Soren with no option but to offer his resignation from the Union cabinet. Round one thus went to the BJP. Round two, however, will almost certainly go to the JMM and the Congress, for the Indian electorate has shown time and again that those whom the state hounds for partisan reasons become its darlings. But the BJP would never have gone to the lengths it has if the remorseless erosion of habeas corpus that I described two weeks ago had not made it so temptingly easy. At its core lies the political establishment's toleration of the police's systematic abuse of its powers of arrest. In every civilised country in the world, a magistrate issues a warrant for arrest only after he or she is satisfied that there is a prima facie case against the defendant. But in India, magistrates have been in bed with the police from the very beginning. Their utter complaisance has encouraged the police to arrest suspects first and leave them to rot in hellish jails while it goes about trying to put together a case against them—usually through the brutal use of third degree methods. And since this hit-or-miss tactic has usually missed, in order to give themselves more time the police has obtained changes in law that now enable it to keep its 'suspects' for up to 60 days in prison without trial. Against this background, it would have been better if Dr Manmohan Singh had not let Soren go, but used this blatant abuse as a launchpad for much-needed police and judicial reform instead.
Posted By: Praveenkrishna G Posted On: Jul 31, 2004 Views: 2055	Shibu Soren's resignation I think even Shibu Soren never feel that he has lost his image because in his declaration today he proudly says that he will come again more powerfully and he is not afraid of anything even the law and he blames the NDA.UPA is not at all bothered about the arrest because they are over powered by the majority they have in the parliament.People will soon forget this and Shibu will be elected unanimously in the next election.
Posted By: Pradeep Kumar .P Posted On: Jul 26, 2004 Views: 2372	shibu soran's resignation If I have image then I can say that I lost my image. If that is not with me how I can claim that I lost my image. To loose something we should have something, if nothing is there what to loose.

Pages [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]